| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 134 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs Secretary, GOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 589942]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2021 |
Jindal Drugs (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 589954]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2021 |
Maithan Ceramics Ltd. vs Comm. Central Tax
[LexDoc Id : 589956]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2021 |
Global Metro vs CC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 589944]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2021 |
Shahid Ali and Jaskaran Enterprises and Ors. vs Pr. Comm.
[LexDoc Id : 583458]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Interglobe Aviation Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Levy of IGST-Exemption from payment of IGST-Petitioner is Public Limited Company and scheduled Airline operator engaged in business of transportation of passengers and goods by air within and ou [LexDoc Id : 594154]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2021 |
Fle Fast Line Express (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 583459]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Ingram Micro India (P) Ltd. vs CC
Rectification of Order-Sections 112 (a), 129B (2) of the Customs Act. Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. Mistake apparent on record-Applicant sought rectification of mistakes in order partly allowing appeal by setting aside penalty under Section 114AA of Act and reducing penalty un [LexDoc Id : 583065]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Fle Fast Line Express (P) Ltd. vs CC
Revocation of registration-Regulation 13 of the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010. Mis-declaration-Appellant is authorized courier under Regulations. Registration of appellant under Regulations, 2010 has been revoked and entire amount of security de [LexDoc Id : 583064]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Volvo Auto India (P) Ltd. vs CC
Determination of value of imported goods-Section 14 of the Customs Act. Rule 2(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. Power of commissioner-Appellant/subsidiary of M/s. Volvo, Sweden who own 99.99% of the appellant's shares. Authority in original held that relationship of appellant and its [LexDoc Id : 583062]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Deepak Handa and Ravi Handa vs Pr. CC
Legality of order-Section 102 of the Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation of goods-Order of confiscation of gold and also of penalty was challenged herein. Whether, gold jewellery confiscated and cash seized covered by section 123 of [LexDoc Id : 583061]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Laesen and Toubro Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 583457]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2021 |
Pankaj Behari Saha vs The State of Tripura and Ors.
Levy of penalty-Section 53 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Failure to audit accounts-Petitioner is dealer and was registered under Act. SCN issued under Section 53(3) of Act as to why penalty not impose to failure to furnish audited ac [LexDoc Id : 580708]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2021 |
M.K. Ranjitsinh and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Protection of wild life-Section 2(a) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Companies Act, 2013. Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016. Installation of high power lines-Petitioner sought to protect two species of birds namely Great Indian Bustard and Lesser Florican, which is on verge of extinction. Existence of overh [LexDoc Id : 581090]
|
SC |
2021 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs Sr. Intelligence Officer and CC
[LexDoc Id : 580606]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Deific Abode LLP and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Legality of Act-Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. Binding nature of order of High Court-Petitioners have assailed of show cause notices issued under sub-section (3) of Section 24 of 1988 Act. Petitioners alleged that unconscionable and i [LexDoc Id : 580203]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2021 |
Sri Sathya Jewellery and Ors. vs Pr. CC and Joint CC
[LexDoc Id : 580608]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Jindal Drugs (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Clearance of imported goods-Payment of duty-Petitioner engaged in import, manufacture and export of aromatic chemicals, natural essential oils across the globe and that less than five per cent o [LexDoc Id : 582440]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2021 |
John Energy Ltd. vs E State of Tripur and Ors.
Levy of value added tax-Deduction of tax at source-Petitioner Company engaged in providing services of drilling and work over rig. Tripura Value Added Tax department sought to levy VAT on transaction i [LexDoc Id : 582436]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2021 |
Innomit Mineral Projects (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CC
[LexDoc Id : 580609]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Rajkamal Builder Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Issuance of Form GST DRC 01-Section 50 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Rule 142(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017. Authority to issue-Whether issuance of DRC 01 under Section 50 of Act is legal and proper. Held, plain reading of rules indicates that Form GST DRC 01 can be served by p [LexDoc Id : 580440]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2021 |
Russell Credit Ltd. vs CTO
Levy of tax-Section 3-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Section 2 (g) (iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Article 286 of Constitution of India. Sale-Petitioner has challenged orders wherein respondent has levied tax on petitioner under Section 3-A of Act on ground that ‘there was transfer of right [LexDoc Id : 580439]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Pam Agro Industries a Partnership Firm and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Legality of notification-Section 5 of the Foreign Trade Act. Section 14 of the Customs Act. Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India. Power to issue notification-Petitioners are engaged in trading of various commodities for last seven years and has been importing broken cashew kernels for trading of such commod [LexDoc Id : 580058]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2021 |
Precision Gasification Services (P) Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 580682]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2021 |
Rameswar Udyog (P) Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 580675]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2021 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| |
