Register free! 
Customs - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 1035   
Title Forum  Year
R.U. Import Export (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 395338]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2009
CCE vs Vayhan Air Controls (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 389035]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Chetan C. Jesrani vs CC [LexDoc Id : 385486]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2009
CC vs S. Alauddin and Shashank Shukla [LexDoc Id : 393326]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2009
CC vs Photo Fax System and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 386800]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2009
J.P.P. Mills (P) Ltd., Pallipalayam Spinners (P) Ltd. and P.K.P.N. Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 386000]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2009
A.D. Dhruva Kumar vs CC [LexDoc Id : 387212]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
ESS Kay International vs CC Condonation of delay: Delay of 73 days in filing appeal-Illness of manager of firm, Difficult for proprietor to institute appeal in his absence, Sufficient cause for delay, Delay condoned, Tribunal directed to decide appeal on merits-The husband of sole proprietor of the appellant-firm, who looked after legal and other matters of the firm in his capacity as the Manager, was ill fro [LexDoc Id : 391437]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
G.V. Ramesh vs CC [LexDoc Id : 388631]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2009
CC vs Rajnarayan Jwalaprasad Application for condonation of delay: Delay of 90 days caused in filing application for restoration of appeal-Dismissal not brought to notice of applicant, Delay properly explained, Application allowed-In an application for condonation of delay of 690 days caused in filing application for restoration of appeal, it was submitted that dismissal of appe [LexDoc Id : 399338]
HC (Gujarat) 2009
Cosmos Trading Co. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 396560]
HC (Gujarat) 2009
Cargill India (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 395613]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Century Star Shipping Ltd. vs CC Release of tug: Tug incurring demurrage charges since seizure-No division bench constituted in absence of second member, Appeal before tribunal pending, Tug lying idle on high sea and deteriorating day by day, Petitioner directed to deposit redemption fine for release-The petitioner, the owner of a tug, had prayed for a direction upon the customs authorities to release the tug by furnishing a bond in terms of Custom [LexDoc Id : 393912]
HC (Calcutta) 2009
Parikh Clearing Agency (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 388655]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2009
Parikh Cleaning Agency (P) Ltd. vs CC and Vice Versa [LexDoc Id : 386772]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2009
Max Overseas vs CC [LexDoc Id : 381444]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2009
Olympic Woollen Mills vs UOI Misdeclaration and undervaluation of goods: Non-communication of order extending time for issuance of show cause notice-Opportunity to make representation under s.124(c) rendered illusory as order passed prior to expiry of seven days and no effective opportunity of hearing afforded, Violation of principles of natural justice, Order granting exemption-The petitioner had imported yarn adopting modus operandi of misdeclaration and undervaluation. Goods and cash were seized after search or petitionerís [LexDoc Id : 413809]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Regent Strips (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 394306]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2009
Arani Agro Oil Industries Ltd. vs CCE and C [LexDoc Id : 392086]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Spectrum Fabrics vs CC [LexDoc Id : 390566]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2009
Microsoft India R and D (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 388860]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Moosa Chinna Satti Babu, Gosala Appala Raju and Chokka Simhadri vs CC [LexDoc Id : 388686]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Global E-Business Operations (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 387229]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
Agarwal Metals and Alloys vs CCE and C [LexDoc Id : 386870]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2009
Nava Bharat Enterprises Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 386827]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2009
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last