Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 449   
Title Forum  Year
Apple Health Care Supplies vs Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 369053]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Kodak India Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) [LexDoc Id : 369049]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Reliance Generators (P) Ltd. vs Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 368677]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Capital Gun House vs CC [LexDoc Id : 337515]
CESTAT 2007
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. vs CTO, State of Tamil Nadu and Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal Goods purchased from registered dealers-Sale of goods outside the State-The sale of tax-exempted goods purchased from registered dealers to purchasers outside the State was liable to tax as per the Tamil Nadu General Sales [LexDoc Id : 329502]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Pondicherry State Co-op Consumer Federation Ltd. vs Union Territory of Pondicherry [LexDoc Id : 328712]
SC 2007
Jaswant Talkies vs CTO [LexDoc Id : 328708]
SC 2007
Harsha Wheel Movers (P) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [LexDoc Id : 368756]
HC (Karnataka) 2007
B.G. Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. vs CTO and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 340313]
HC (Chennai) 2007
CST vs Aero Traders (P) Ltd. Central Sales Tax-Appeal against Tribunal’s order-The high court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against the tribunal’s order that had ruled that the sale by the assessee was in the course of export an [LexDoc Id : 344144]
HC (Delhi) 2007
B.O.C. India Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 363152]
HC (Jharkhand) 2007
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 360458]
HC (Jharkhand) 2007
K.P.S. Elango vs District Collector, Salem and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 341087]
HC (Chennai) 2007
S.S. Collections vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 337509]
CESTAT 2007
CST vs N.H. Polymers Sales tax adjudicating authorities-Non interference of High court-The High court had no power to interfere and condone a delay of 90 days in taking recourse to effective remedies before quasi judicial sales tax adjud [LexDoc Id : 336286]
HC (Bombay) 2007
Chandrapur Aushnik Vij Kendra Karmachari Path Sanstha vs Divisional Joint Registrar Co-op Societies and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 334498]
HC (Bombay) 2007
Sharda Industries vs CTO [LexDoc Id : 340340]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Precision Casting and Component Exports vs CC [LexDoc Id : 336534]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2007
Canara Security Press (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 368790]
HC (Karnataka) 2007
Shree Pandurang Ssk Ltd.,In re [LexDoc Id : 342117]
Commr. Appl. 2007
Great Eastern Impex (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 340314]
HC (Karnataka) 2007
Vittesse Export Import vs CC [LexDoc Id : 333932]
CESTAT 2007
Akross Synthetics (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Trade Tax and Anr. Grant of sales tax exemption-Prescribed conditions-A plea for grant of sales tax exemption was dismissed on account of non-compliance to prescribed statutory conditions that required the the petitioner [LexDoc Id : 338618]
HC (Allahabad) 2007
Gateway Supports Services (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 336531]
CESTAT 2007
Pradip M. Reshamwala vs CC [LexDoc Id : 333479]
CESTAT 2007
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last