First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 358 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Asst. CTO vs Suresh-Jagdish Chand
[LexDoc Id : 470966]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Eicher Motors Ltd. @Enfield India Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 453757]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2013 |
Asst. CTO vs Ravi Pulses (P) Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 470964]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Domnic D'Souza (Dead) through L.Rs vs Julie D'Mello
[LexDoc Id : 459710]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Rajendra Singh Chhatrasal Singh Kushwaha @ Rajendra C. Kushwaha @ R.C. Kukshwaha (Dead) through L.Rs vs Jitendra Singh Rajendra Singh Kushwah, Suman Jitendra Singh Kushwaha, Nisha Jitendra Singh Kushwaha and Suresh Rajendra Singh Kushwaha
[LexDoc Id : 459709]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Noor Mohd. Shami Shaikh and Anr. vs Maharashtra Housing and Development Board and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459345]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Vardhman Developers Ltd. vs Borla Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459130]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Vikash Rexine House vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 469835]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
CTO vs Khandelwal Drug Agencies
[LexDoc Id : 470961]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Raju Muthaya Shetty vs Maharashtra Executor and Trustee Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 459137]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Trustees Co. Ltd. vs Ashok Raju Shetty and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459050]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and Ors. vs State of Maharasthra
Vacancy in posts: Three persons manning relevant posts as against sanctioned strength of 10-State Government directed to take necessary steps for filling in vacant posts-Out of the sanctioned strength of 10 members (five judicial and five administrative), at present, there was only one president, who was a retired judi [LexDoc Id : 451246]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Lydia Agnes Rodriques Nee D'Cunha, Ivy Fernandes nee D'Cunha vs Philomena Anne Pereira nee Pereira, Prudence Lobo nee D'Souza, Percy D'Souza, Pamela Mary D'Souza and Ors. vs Joseph Anthony D'Cunha, Finian Anthony D'Cunha and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459124]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal vs Ashok Jagjivan Gokal, Kishore Jagjivan Gokal, Hemraj C. Ashar, Prashant K. Ashar and Ravindra Gokal
[LexDoc Id : 459052]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs Government of Andhra Pradesh and Superintending Engineer and Ors.
Quantification of taxable turnover: Four percent of tax not added separately to estimated value-No estimated value as on date of petitioner's participating in tender, Unauthorised deduction and retention of monies without making it over to tax department improper-The petitioner had exercised the option to pay value added tax under s.4(7)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005 and made an application [LexDoc Id : 456498]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
Lanco Infratech Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and CTO
[LexDoc Id : 453229]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2013 |
Hiradgaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra, Nagnath Vividh Karyakari, Dattu Zumbar Bhujbal, Alka, Rekha, Nikita Waman Shankar Darekar, Vilas Rangnath Darekar, Mohan Rangnath Darekar, Nana Gulab Darekar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458885]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 452484]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Radhabai Vithal Waikar vs Laxmanrao Shankarrao Shinde (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459337]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Aval Exports vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 458753]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Tata Motors Finance Ltd. and Family Credit Ltd. vs Assistant CST
ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Joint CST
[LexDoc Id : 451005]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2013 |
Thalappalam Ser. Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 450467]
|
SC |
2013 |
Rajguhan Exports and Imports vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 470225]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Adhunik Transport Organization Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax and Ors.
Rectification of mistakes: No clerical nor arithmetical mistake in impugned order-Provision of rectification not attracted, Plea to accord opportunity to file documents accepted, Matter remitted-As per s.54 of the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2002 the Commissioner was empowered to rectify his order for correcting any clerical or arithmet [LexDoc Id : 457072]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
Shailaja S. Godbole, Jaysen S. Mastakar and Ors. vs Disha Constructions and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459033]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|