| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 589 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sai Tirumala Papers (P) Ltd. CTO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 413322]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Hare Krishna Boxes (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 412912]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Sri Balaji Flour Mills vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 411067]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Asian Peroxide Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 409575]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Vicrocil Oil Co. vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 425484]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
United Agencies vs ACCT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443601]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
G.D. Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442908]
|
WBTT |
2010 |
L and T Komatsu Ltd. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 413305]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
DLF Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Claim of DFCE Certificate under SFIS-Sale of immovable property in foreign exchange-The petitioner had claimed issuance of Duty Free Credit Entitlement Certificates under the Served From India Scheme while selling immovable property i [LexDoc Id : 400485]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Lawrence and Mayo India (P) Ltd. vs STO and Ors.
Sokia India (P) Ltd. vs CST and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 429996]
|
WBTT |
2010 |
John Rodrigues, Anthony Dennis, Luiza D'Souza, Rui Fernandes (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. vs Shangrila Apartments, Co-operative Tribunal and Nominee of Registrar of Co-op Societies
[LexDoc Id : 400396]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Coastal Andhra Power Ltd. vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 419640]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Chemical Centre India vs CC
Detention of goods: Detention on the ground that suffix ‘BP’ after citric acid monohydrate indicating goods of pharma grade-Suffix ‘BP’ merely an indication of quality or grade of imported goods, Certificate of importer that imported goods would not be used for medicinal purposes relevant, Insistence of licence improper once such certificate issued-The petitioner was a partnership firm engaged in importing citric acid monohydrate. Its goods were detained on the ground that the term ‘BP-93’ suffix [LexDoc Id : 404470]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
New Vikas Co-op Industrial Society Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400339]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
CC vs Kumarakam Lake Resorts
EPCG Scheme: Non-fulfilment of export obligation-Import of cars by availing concessional rate of duty, Conscious registration of cars in name of directors, Cars used for pick up and drop tourists staying in presidential suites, Differential duty and interest directed to be paid-The respondent-resort had imported two BMW cars from foreign countries in terms of Customs Notification No. 44 dated 19 April 2002 and availed concess [LexDoc Id : 413789]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2010 |
S. Darshan Singh vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400345]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Joyna John vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400336]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Hemant Verma vs Gulshan Kumar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400246]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Rajpura Janta Co-op vs Maya Devi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400122]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Gagan Handloom vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 419842]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Sai Iron India (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar, Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Dy. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 401637]
|
HC (Patna) |
2010 |
Oriental Carbon and Chemicals Ltd., Continental Carbon India Ltd., LG India Polymers (P) Ltd., R.S. Chemicals, Delta Factors India (P) Ltd., R.S. Switch Gears, Behari Lal Pahwa and Sons Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400518]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Pradeep Shanti Prasad Jain vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 408090]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Graphite India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 408081]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vacmet Packagings India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Rejection of claim that firm a group company: Definition of group company envisaging two enterprises and not meaning an individual-No shareholding by firm in petitioner, Individual partners of firm holding shares in petitioner, No fault in declining to extend benefits of Target Plus Scheme and in refusing to treat firm as its group company-The petitioner was a star export house. However, its claim that a firm was its group company was not accepted and resultantly petitioner’s claim under [LexDoc Id : 400082]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
