Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 58   
Title Forum  Year
DLF Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. Claim of DFCE Certificate under SFIS-Sale of immovable property in foreign exchange-The petitioner had claimed issuance of Duty Free Credit Entitlement Certificates under the Served From India Scheme while selling immovable property i [LexDoc Id : 400485]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Chemical Centre India vs CC Detention of goods: Detention on the ground that suffix ‘BP’ after citric acid monohydrate indicating goods of pharma grade-Suffix ‘BP’ merely an indication of quality or grade of imported goods, Certificate of importer that imported goods would not be used for medicinal purposes relevant, Insistence of licence improper once such certificate issued-The petitioner was a partnership firm engaged in importing citric acid monohydrate. Its goods were detained on the ground that the term ‘BP-93’ suffix [LexDoc Id : 404470]
HC (Delhi) 2010
CC vs Kumarakam Lake Resorts EPCG Scheme: Non-fulfilment of export obligation-Import of cars by availing concessional rate of duty, Conscious registration of cars in name of directors, Cars used for pick up and drop tourists staying in presidential suites, Differential duty and interest directed to be paid-The respondent-resort had imported two BMW cars from foreign countries in terms of Customs Notification No. 44 dated 19 April 2002 and availed concess [LexDoc Id : 413789]
HC (Kerala) 2010
Pradeep Shanti Prasad Jain vs CC [LexDoc Id : 408090]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2010
Graphite India Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 408081]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2010
Vacmet Packagings India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr. Rejection of claim that firm a group company: Definition of group company envisaging two enterprises and not meaning an individual-No shareholding by firm in petitioner, Individual partners of firm holding shares in petitioner, No fault in declining to extend benefits of Target Plus Scheme and in refusing to treat firm as its group company-The petitioner was a star export house. However, its claim that a firm was its group company was not accepted and resultantly petitioner’s claim under [LexDoc Id : 400082]
HC (Delhi) 2010
General Export Enterprises vs CC [LexDoc Id : 405020]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2010
Ishwar Impex vs CC [LexDoc Id : 408110]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2010
Kitti Steels Ltd. vs CC and CE [LexDoc Id : 406890]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2010
UOI and Ors. vs Prince Rubber Industries Appeal to Supreme Court: Direction to release grant of eight percent cash compulsory support premium against advance import licence-Application for relief made within time as per Circular, Failure of concerned authorities to take necessary action on application, Inaction held not a ground to deny claim, Appeal dismissed-The Deputy Director General had written to the respondent that its claim for grant of eight percent cash compulsory support premium against the advanc [LexDoc Id : 399108]
SC 2010
Veeyem Exports vs CC [LexDoc Id : 408086]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2010
K. Raheja Corporation (P) Ltd., Ramesh Valecha, Paradigm Logistic and Distribution (P) Ltd., Maxgrow Finlease (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Goa, Goa Industrial Development Corpn., A.V. Palekar, V.K. Jha, Sanjeet Rodriques, Board of Approval and UOI [LexDoc Id : 398807]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Munjani Brothers vs CC [LexDoc Id : 408088]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2010
UOI and Ors. vs Harsh Vardhan Chauhan Charge sheet initiating disciplinary proceedings-Initiation against an officer performing quasi-judicial functions-The department had initiated disciplinary proceedings against the respondent in respect of the adjudicating order passed by him on the ground that he [LexDoc Id : 398583]
HC (Delhi) 2010
C.S. Agarwal vs State and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 397969]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Mohd. Afaq Khan vs U.P. Export Corpn. Ltd. Realisation of outstanding dues against firm: Auction notice served on petitioner as partner of firm-Notice not invalidated on wrong mention of name therein, No appeal or petition filed against penalty order, Petitioner jointly and severally liable as partner, Notice declined to be quashed-The petitioner was a partner in defaulting firm. He was served with an auction notice for the auction of his agricultural property for the realisation [LexDoc Id : 404472]
HC (Allahabad) 2010
DKM Cassette (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. Imposition of Penalty-Impugned penalty order not mentioning which clause attracted-The need for a penalty order having to specifically indicate the precise provision under which the penalty was being imposed was emphasized by the Sup [LexDoc Id : 397068]
HC (Delhi) 2010
NCS Sugars Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 403216]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2010
S.P. Fabricators (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 402942]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2010
Friends Trading Co. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 406888]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2010
Kashmiri Lal vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 396117]
HC (Delhi) 2010
CC vs Nandi Marketing

Lukkad Impex and Balaji Exports vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 404665]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2010
Sanmar Speciality Chemicals Ltd. vs CCE and C [LexDoc Id : 404235]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2010
CCE vs Bhalaria Metal Craft (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 398569]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2010
CC vs Ford India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 398682]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2010
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last