Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 71   
Title Forum  Year
Mass Trading Co. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 426106]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2011
Pee Jay International vs CC

CC vs Pee Jay International
[LexDoc Id : 426670]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Champion Photostat Industrial Corpn. vs UOI and Ors. Non-acceptance of bill of entry lodged under ‘Self’ category: No condition in s.46 that bill of entry to be submitted by importer himself or that importer had to have some educational qualification-Qualification fixed under Public Notice No. 8 dated 12 May 2005 not extendible to importer who wished to import goods by himself-The petitioner challenged the order whereby the bill of entry lodged by it had not been accepted under ‘Self’ category, as the petitioner did not sati [LexDoc Id : 419602]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2011
CC vs Natural Stone Exports Ltd. Levy of duty: 64 percent of NFEP achieved on goods other than capital goods-Setting aside order imposing penalty and remanding case to original authority upheld-The assessee, which was a 100 percent EOU, had achieved 64 percent of NFEP goods other than capital goods, which were not utilised in the manufacture [LexDoc Id : 440089]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
Sanghi Industries Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 428597]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Reliance Precitone Jewellers (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 452144]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
CCE vs Bansal Metallic Oxides [LexDoc Id : 426262]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2011
Noble Resources and Trading India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. Benefit under DEPB Scheme-Restoration of benefit could always take place with effect from anterior date-The restoration of a benefit could always take place with effect from an anterior date. [LexDoc Id : 418137]
HC (Bombay) 2011
CC vs Sicpa India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 429413]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Cummins India Ltd. vs CCE Appeal against pre-deposit: Amendment to rule 6(6)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004-Tribunal directed to consider application for waiver afresh in view of subsequent development-The tribunal, noting that a prima facie case for total waiver was not made out, called upon the appellant to deposit 60 percent of the amount demanded [LexDoc Id : 429394]
HC (Bombay) 2011
CCE and Customs vs N.B.M. Industries [LexDoc Id : 418659]
HC (Gujarat) 2011
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. and Prakash Glass and Rubber Works vs CCE

CCE vs Vayhan Air Controls (P) Ltd. and Indian Timber Products Ltd.

Zuari Cements Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 416307]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2011
Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 443968]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2011
New Wave Industries vs CC [LexDoc Id : 417288]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Amar Cold Storage vs CC [LexDoc Id : 439899]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2011
Tulsi Trading Co. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 429034]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Crescent Shipping Agency India Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 436065]
Commr. Appl. 2011
UOI and Anr. vs Himsheel International Beneficial circular vis-à-vis Oppressive circular-Assessee entitled to claim enforcement of oppressive circular prospectively-A beneficial circular had to be applied retrospectively while oppressive circular had to be applied prospectively. Thus, when the circular was against [LexDoc Id : 413680]
HC (Delhi) 2011
Carmel Exports and Imports vs CC Option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation-Goods not be such as falling under the category of prohibited goods for purpose of import-Even in a case where the goods were liable for confiscation, s.125 of the Customs Act 1962 provided for redemption of goods on payment of fine so long [LexDoc Id : 426941]
HC (Kerala) 2011
Leotex vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 430479]
HC (Kerala) 2011
Euroflax Industries and Anuj Mittal vs UOI, Textile Commissioner and Director General of Foreign Trade [LexDoc Id : 413734]
HC (Bombay) 2011
Modipon Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 448555]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
CC vs Areva T & D India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 455571]
HC (Madras) 2011
Tata Communications Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. Entitlement to SFIS benefits to telecommunications providers: PIC opining foreign exchange earnings earned from optic fibre cables not entitled to SFIS benefits-Task of PIC to interpret Foreign Trade Policy and not to modify or amend the same, DGFT Circular based on PIC’s opinion quashed and set aside-The petitioner had provided dedicated bandwidth services to foreign telecommunication carriers through a continuous optic fibre cable network owned by [LexDoc Id : 413423]
HC (Bombay) 2011
Jubilant Organosys Ltd. vs ACCE Rebate of duty: Question of retrospective effect of Corrigendum dated 29 November 2011-Orders holding grant of rebate as erroneous set aside-Condition (v) of Customs Notification No. 43 dated 19 April 2002 had been corrected by a Corrigendum dated 29 November 2011 whereby it was clarified t [LexDoc Id : 429129]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last