| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 32 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
APMC Yashwanthapura vs Selva Foods
Exemption from payment of market fees-Section 65 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act of 1966. Levy of market fees-Respondent trader engaged in business of selling cleaned and processed spices in name and style of M/s. Selva Foods within market area of Appellant. O [LexDoc Id : 586846]
|
SC |
2021 |
Pooja Ceratech (P) Ltd. vs Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Maintainability of Petition-Judicial review of contractual matters-Respondent - Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited issued tender notice for sale of gas. Whether, High Court justified in dismissing petition. Held, [LexDoc Id : 586851]
|
SC |
2021 |
Dabur India Ltd. vs State of Orissa
[LexDoc Id : 587454]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2021 |
Schneider Electric India (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Comm.(ST)
Validity of assessment-Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Section 21 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Rule 7 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007. Taxable turnover-Assessment order challenged by petitioner on ground of calculation of taxable turnover. Whether, petitioner was required to include CST turnover into [LexDoc Id : 587453]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Bellary Oxyegn Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 589190]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Tvl. R. Mahimaidoss vs The State Tax Officer
Validity of assessment-Sections 22 (6a), 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. CST Act, 1956. Revision of assessment-Petition challenged assessment order on ground that mistake in return by itself cannot be basis for confirming demand based on entries in respective r [LexDoc Id : 587423]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Robo Silicon (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 589803]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Sai Agencies vs The State of Maharashtra, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 590405]
|
HC (Mumbai) |
2021 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs State of Orissa
[LexDoc Id : 590219]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2021 |
Saint Gobain Glass India Ltd. vs The Appellate Joint Comm. and The Deputy Comm.
[LexDoc Id : 590139]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2021 |
Kaleesuwari Refinery (P) Ltd. vs The Accountant General and CTO
[LexDoc Id : 589938]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
State of Karnataka vs The Central Arecanut and Cocoa Marketing and Processing Co-op Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 589939]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Lenovo India (P) Ltd. vs Dy. Comm. Commercial Tcommercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 589955]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Wipro Ltd. (Acquirer of 3-D Networks (P) Ltd.) vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 589946]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Transworld Star Manjushree vs ACCT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 589945]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs CST
[LexDoc Id : 583454]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2021 |
Akzo Nobel India Ltd. vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 580610]
|
HC (Hyderabad) |
2021 |
K.S. Rao vs Secretary, Dept. of Personnel and Training and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 583954]
|
CAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Infra Engineers India vs CTO
Disallowance of adjustment of input tax credit-Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Section 84 of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Section 18(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Rule 10 (10) (b) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Rules 2007. Revision of assessment-Respondent re-determined tax payable by petitioner by re-computing gross tax. Petitioner claims to have adjusted amount of Rs.23,31,952/- being Input [LexDoc Id : 582941]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2021 |
Spacewood Furnishers (P) Ltd. vs The State of Telangana
[LexDoc Id : 580607]
|
HC (Hyderabad) |
2021 |
State of Karnataka vs Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.
Denial of input tax credit-Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Entitlement of input tax credit-Respondent-assessee is dealer registered under Act and is engaged in execution of civil works contracts. Assessee claimed to have purchased goods from [LexDoc Id : 582442]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
Utkal Moulders vs State of Orissa represented by the CST
Deduction of freight-Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Taxable sales turnover-Petitioner is manufacturer of cast iron goods and is also engaged in trading of iron and steel goods. Petitioner is a registered dealer under OST Act [LexDoc Id : 580710]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2021 |
MRF Ltd. vs Dy. Comm. Commercial Taxes and Anr.
Disallowance of discount-Section 12-D of the J and K General Sales Tax Act, 1962. Rule 19 of the J and K General Sales Tax Rules, 1962. Taxable turnover-Assessee Company engaged in manufacturing of tyres, tubes, flaps, tread rubber etc. and sell its products across county through various sale depots in [LexDoc Id : 580711]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2021 |
Russell Credit Ltd. vs CTO
Levy of tax-Section 3-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Section 2 (g) (iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Article 286 of Constitution of India. Sale-Petitioner has challenged orders wherein respondent has levied tax on petitioner under Section 3-A of Act on ground that ‘there was transfer of right [LexDoc Id : 580439]
|
HC (Madras) |
2021 |
Dynatech Tools and Devices vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Restriction of input tax credit-Section 12 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Rule 133(c) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005. Capital goods scheme-Petitioner partnership firm engaged in manufacture and sale of machine components, jigs and fixtures. Petitioner had filed returns in Form VAT 100 and [LexDoc Id : 582944]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2021 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| |
