Register free! 
Employment - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 459   
Title Forum  Year
Damien Rongrin vs State of Meghalaya and Ors. Promotion to the post of Assistant Enforcement Inspector-Essential educational qualification-The order of the single judge of accepting the grievance of petitioners against the promotion order whereby the respondents had been promoted to the p [LexDoc Id : 504901]
HC (Meghalaya) 2016
Nibir Chand Karan vs Paschim Banga Gramin Bank and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504887]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
Neha Sharma and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors. Subsequent raise in bar for selection: Modification of yardstick in consonance with need of hour-Certain posts especially reserved not required to be filled up as a matter of routine- Whether the contention that by subsequently raising the bar for selection the whole process of selection, if not the actual selection, stood vit [LexDoc Id : 504886]
HC (Patna) 2016
Khuraijam Surjit Singh and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors. Appointment to the post of Surveyors-Right to appointment-Rejection of appellants’ prayer for a direction to the respondents to appoint them who came out successful in DPC in the post of Surveyors in the Depa [LexDoc Id : 504879]
HC (Gauhati) 2016
District Sports Officer vs Labour Court and Ors. Reinstatement along with back wages-Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Dismissal from service-Order passed by the Labour Court of holding the termination of services of respondent workmen invalid for not complying with the provisions of section [LexDoc Id : 504874]
HC (Allahabad) 2016
Bankim Chandra Adhikary and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors. Equal pay for equal work: State at liberty to classify employees on basis of qualification, duties and responsibilities-Petitioners not at par with doctors of health services of Government of West Bengal- Whether the respondents could be directed to treat the petitioners at par with the employees of health Sservices of the Government of West Benga [LexDoc Id : 504827]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
L.P. Shahi College and Anr. and Ramdeo Prasad Sharma vs Seema Mishra and Ors. Non-recommendation of names of persons for post of lecturer: Advertisement of two posts-Mandatory on part of Commission to recommend two plus two candidates in terms of section 2(9)- Whether the single judge was justified in holding that the erstwhile Bihar College Service Commission had violated the provision of section 2(9) [LexDoc Id : 504032]
SC 2016
Anurag Kumar Singh and Ors. and Sharwan Kumar Tripathi and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors. Selection of officers only to number of posts advertised-Court not empowered to give direction contrary to Act or Rules in exercise of judicial discretion- Whether the high court was justified in directing selection of Assistant Prosecuting Officers only to the number of posts that were advertised. [LexDoc Id : 504030]
SC 2016
Vidya Akhave vs UOI, Department of Women and Children and Ors. Sentence imposed by disciplinary authority: Scope of interference by high court-Penalty imposed not shockingly disproportionate to the conduct of second respondent- Whether the high court could examine the proportionality of sentence imposed by the disciplinary authority. Held, it was well settled that unles [LexDoc Id : 505202]
HC (Bombay) 2016
K. Babapai and Ors. vs K.V.R. Murthy and Ors. Recovery of amount of increments: Interpretation of ordinance 200 by tribunal-Ordinance 200 nullified and distorted, Conclusions of tribunal not supported by any established principles of law - Whether the tribunal was justified in concluding that the recovery of amount of increments effected by the petitioner was required to be quashed [LexDoc Id : 505193]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Vidya Bhushan and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors. Non- Appointment to the post of Amin-Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013. Statutory Force of Rules-The Writ applicants sought review of the order on the sole ground that the Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013 to regulate recruitment/appointment and other [LexDoc Id : 504911]
HC (Patna) 2016
State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs Vandana Devi Vyas and Ors. Quashing of order of suspension-Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958. Validity of inquiry-The State of Rajasthan challenged the order of the Single Judge of quashing the order passed by the disciplinary authority in the inquiry under Rule 1 [LexDoc Id : 504910]
HC (Rajasthan) 2016
Rajesh Kumar Singh vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504906]
HC (Allahabad) 2016
Rabi Kant Tiwary vs State of Bihar and Ors. Order of suspension-Rule 9(1) (c) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005. Registration of FIR-The appellant challenged his order of the suspension on the ground that it was issued without issuing a show-cause notice. Whether, the order of the s [LexDoc Id : 504905]
HC (Patna) 2016
Purnanand Upadhyay and Ors. vs General Insurance Corpn. of India and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504904]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Jayantilal Bhikhabhai Bhatt vs State of Gujarat and Ors. Deduction of amount from pension: Penalty not shockingly disproportionate-Widow of deceased applicant receiving family pension in accordance with rules and regulations, Application dismissed- Whether the State Government, after considering the report of inquiry officer and the other materials on record, was justified in imposing penal [LexDoc Id : 504876]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Debansu Bhaumik and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504873]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
Bharatbhai Kanubhai Mevada and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors. Regularization of services: Services treated as temporary-Applicants put in regular pay scale and their services regularised- Whether, despite regularizing the services of applicants, the order stating that their services were treated as temporary was valid. Held, altho [LexDoc Id : 504828]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Ashutosh Kumar Jha and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors. Scope of interference with opinion of experts body: Power of judicial review-Miserable failure to make out a case of prejudice, Conflicting stands in pleadings of appellants- Whether the correctness of opinion of experts body should be gone into, in the present facts and circumstances of the case, in a proceeding unde [LexDoc Id : 504826]
HC (Patna) 2016
Arvind Kumar Rai vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. Orders creating and promoting on newly created post: Service Rules not amended till date-Initiation of departmental proceeding no ground for creation of another post, Orders quashed- Whether the order whereby the State Government had created a post of Deputy Director (Technical) temporarily as also the order whereby the fourt [LexDoc Id : 504825]
HC (Allahabad) 2016
Arvind Chikara and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504824]
HC (Allahabad) 2016
Anurag and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors. Recommendation against posts advertised: Posts vacant due to non-joining of candidates-Appellants having right to be considered against the existing vacancies by virtue of their merit position- Whether once the Bihar Staff Selection Commission had made its recommendation against all the posts, so advertised, could it not make recommenda [LexDoc Id : 504822]
HC (Patna) 2016
Jyotiben D. Shah vs M.E. Society and Ors. Punishment of removal from service: Charges levelled not so serious to justify penalty of removal-Contradictory finding of tribunal, Nature of charges not considered, Order of dismissal set aside- Whether the punishment of removal from service was commensurate with the alleged misconduct or grossly disproportionate to the charges levelled an [LexDoc Id : 504878]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Joy Gopal Debnath vs Hindustan Paper Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 504877]
HC (Gauhati) 2016
Hooghly Dock and Port Engineers Ltd. vs Govt. of India and Ors. Reference of dispute to Conciliation Officer-Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Duties of Conciliation Officer-Dispute has arisen over the calculation of VRS of employees of petitioner after the Government of India decided to disinvestment it. By an order the [LexDoc Id : 504875]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last