First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 459 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Damien Rongrin vs State of Meghalaya and Ors.
Promotion to the post of Assistant Enforcement Inspector-Essential educational qualification-The order of the single judge of accepting the grievance of petitioners against the promotion order whereby the respondents had been promoted to the p [LexDoc Id : 504901]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2016 |
Nibir Chand Karan vs Paschim Banga Gramin Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504887]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Neha Sharma and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Subsequent raise in bar for selection: Modification of yardstick in consonance with need of hour-Certain posts especially reserved not required to be filled up as a matter of routine-
Whether the contention that by subsequently raising the bar for selection the whole process of selection, if not the actual selection, stood vit [LexDoc Id : 504886]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Khuraijam Surjit Singh and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Appointment to the post of Surveyors-Right to appointment-Rejection of appellants’ prayer for a direction to the respondents to appoint them who came out successful in DPC in the post of Surveyors in the Depa [LexDoc Id : 504879]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
District Sports Officer vs Labour Court and Ors.
Reinstatement along with back wages-Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Dismissal from service-Order passed by the Labour Court of holding the termination of services of respondent workmen invalid for not complying with the provisions of section [LexDoc Id : 504874]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Bankim Chandra Adhikary and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Equal pay for equal work: State at liberty to classify employees on basis of qualification, duties and responsibilities-Petitioners not at par with doctors of health services of Government of West Bengal-
Whether the respondents could be directed to treat the petitioners at par with the employees of health Sservices of the Government of West Benga [LexDoc Id : 504827]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
L.P. Shahi College and Anr. and Ramdeo Prasad Sharma vs Seema Mishra and Ors.
Non-recommendation of names of persons for post of lecturer: Advertisement of two posts-Mandatory on part of Commission to recommend two plus two candidates in terms of section 2(9)-
Whether the single judge was justified in holding that the erstwhile Bihar College Service Commission had violated the provision of section 2(9) [LexDoc Id : 504032]
|
SC |
2016 |
Anurag Kumar Singh and Ors. and Sharwan Kumar Tripathi and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
Selection of officers only to number of posts advertised-Court not empowered to give direction contrary to Act or Rules in exercise of judicial discretion-
Whether the high court was justified in directing selection of Assistant Prosecuting Officers only to the number of posts that were advertised. [LexDoc Id : 504030]
|
SC |
2016 |
Vidya Akhave vs UOI, Department of Women and Children and Ors.
Sentence imposed by disciplinary authority: Scope of interference by high court-Penalty imposed not shockingly disproportionate to the conduct of second respondent-
Whether the high court could examine the proportionality of sentence imposed by the disciplinary authority. Held, it was well settled that unles [LexDoc Id : 505202]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
K. Babapai and Ors. vs K.V.R. Murthy and Ors.
Recovery of amount of increments: Interpretation of ordinance 200 by tribunal-Ordinance 200 nullified and distorted, Conclusions of tribunal not supported by any established principles of law -
Whether the tribunal was justified in concluding that the recovery of amount of increments effected by the petitioner was required to be quashed [LexDoc Id : 505193]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Vidya Bhushan and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Non- Appointment to the post of Amin-Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013. Statutory Force of Rules-The Writ applicants sought review of the order on the sole ground that the Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013 to regulate recruitment/appointment and other [LexDoc Id : 504911]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs Vandana Devi Vyas and Ors.
Quashing of order of suspension-Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958. Validity of inquiry-The State of Rajasthan challenged the order of the Single Judge of quashing the order passed by the disciplinary authority in the inquiry under Rule 1 [LexDoc Id : 504910]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Rajesh Kumar Singh vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504906]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Rabi Kant Tiwary vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Order of suspension-Rule 9(1) (c) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005. Registration of FIR-The appellant challenged his order of the suspension on the ground that it was issued without issuing a show-cause notice. Whether, the order of the s [LexDoc Id : 504905]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Purnanand Upadhyay and Ors. vs General Insurance Corpn. of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504904]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Jayantilal Bhikhabhai Bhatt vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Deduction of amount from pension: Penalty not shockingly disproportionate-Widow of deceased applicant receiving family pension in accordance with rules and regulations, Application dismissed-
Whether the State Government, after considering the report of inquiry officer and the other materials on record, was justified in imposing penal [LexDoc Id : 504876]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Debansu Bhaumik and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504873]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Bharatbhai Kanubhai Mevada and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Regularization of services: Services treated as temporary-Applicants put in regular pay scale and their services regularised-
Whether, despite regularizing the services of applicants, the order stating that their services were treated as temporary was valid. Held, altho [LexDoc Id : 504828]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Ashutosh Kumar Jha and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Scope of interference with opinion of experts body: Power of judicial review-Miserable failure to make out a case of prejudice, Conflicting stands in pleadings of appellants-
Whether the correctness of opinion of experts body should be gone into, in the present facts and circumstances of the case, in a proceeding unde [LexDoc Id : 504826]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Arvind Kumar Rai vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Orders creating and promoting on newly created post: Service Rules not amended till date-Initiation of departmental proceeding no ground for creation of another post, Orders quashed-
Whether the order whereby the State Government had created a post of Deputy Director (Technical) temporarily as also the order whereby the fourt [LexDoc Id : 504825]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Arvind Chikara and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504824]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Anurag and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Recommendation against posts advertised: Posts vacant due to non-joining of candidates-Appellants having right to be considered against the existing vacancies by virtue of their merit position-
Whether once the Bihar Staff Selection Commission had made its recommendation against all the posts, so advertised, could it not make recommenda [LexDoc Id : 504822]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Jyotiben D. Shah vs M.E. Society and Ors.
Punishment of removal from service: Charges levelled not so serious to justify penalty of removal-Contradictory finding of tribunal, Nature of charges not considered, Order of dismissal set aside-
Whether the punishment of removal from service was commensurate with the alleged misconduct or grossly disproportionate to the charges levelled an [LexDoc Id : 504878]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Joy Gopal Debnath vs Hindustan Paper Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504877]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Hooghly Dock and Port Engineers Ltd. vs Govt. of India and Ors.
Reference of dispute to Conciliation Officer-Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Duties of Conciliation Officer-Dispute has arisen over the calculation of VRS of employees of petitioner after the Government of India decided to disinvestment it. By an order the [LexDoc Id : 504875]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|