First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 459 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sunil Arora vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Appointment on compassionate grounds: No vested right on mere pendency of application for appointment-Petitioner not having requisite qualification, Petition dismissed-
Whether the prayer seeking appointment as LDC under the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependent of Deceased Government Servants Rules 1 [LexDoc Id : 507459]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Anshu and Ors. vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Non-evaluation of answer sheets: Violation of instructions-No scope for interference in action of respondents in not correcting the papers of petitioners-
Whether the prayer seeking direction for evaluation of OMR answer sheets of written examination and for short listing the candidates for intervi [LexDoc Id : 507461]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Bhuri Singh vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Dismissal of claim for appointment: Direction of appointment duly complied with-Judgment of tribunal in appellant's favour, No occasion for further grievance-
Whether dismissal of appellant's claim for appointment as pipe fitter with retrospective effect was justified. Held, the order passed by the tri [LexDoc Id : 507462]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Amit vs UOI and Anr.
Denial of appointment: Diploma not equivalent to graduation degree of a recognized university-Employer to decide the eligibility criteria, Courts not empowered to substitute their own view-
Whether denial of appointment to the petitioner on the ground that he only had three years diploma in Hotel Management instead of the required g [LexDoc Id : 507460]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Pramod Kumar Trivedi vs State of U.P. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506544]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Harsh Yadav and Ors. vs Panjab University and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506535]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Swaminarayan Navsarjan Vidyalaya vs Bhavnaben Narharishankar Pathak and Ors.
Legality of appointment: Entitlement to benefit of Fifth Pay Commission-No issue regarding initial appointment, No privilege or benefit extended by any rule to private schools not getting grant-in-aid-
Whether the tribunal was justified in holding that when the first respondent was having the qualification of B.A., B.Ed. her appointment was to [LexDoc Id : 506612]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Sunita Chandrakant Kalekar vs Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506611]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Sriniwas Malliah Memorial Theatre Crafts Trust (Regd.)
Employees, Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952: Payments made to trainee-Non-existence of master-servant relationship, Section 2(f) not attracted-
Whether a trainee, an artisan, who was being imparted and given training in traditional handicrafts such as puppet making, bamboo crafts, paper [LexDoc Id : 506610]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Kuresha Bibi vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506546]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2016 |
Gousul Azam vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506542]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Azizul Haque Laskar vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506541]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Lala Ram Sharma and Ors. vs Rajasthan State Co-Op. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506538]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Dena Bank and Ors. vs K.H. Zhimo
[LexDoc Id : 506532]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2016 |
Ashok Kumar Patel and Ors. vs State of U.P. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506531]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Prayer for appointment: Candidate not having legal right to be appointed-Requirement of persons for various projects, Respondent directed to undertake appointment process-
Whether the respondents could be directed to appoint the petitioners. Held, a candidate did not have a legal right to be appointed. Neither was [LexDoc Id : 506638]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Dineshbhai Bhagvanbhai Patel vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506533]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
UOI and Ors. vs All India Trade Union Congress and Ors.
Direction to not permit workmen to complete 240 days: Inhumane service conditions-Services of workmen not temporary, Mandatory directions issued for regularization of services-
Whether the direction to the authorities to ensure that no labourer be permitted to work for more than 239 days and thereafter they should be di [LexDoc Id : 506641]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
Sangeeta Choudhary vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Candidature for appointment: Non-compliance with directions of high court-Experience entitling petitioner to bonus marks, Direction to count experience from date of directions-
Whether the candidature for appointment of petitioner on the post of Nurse Gr. II with all consequential benefits could be considered. Held, the [LexDoc Id : 506608]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Ramesh Singh and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506607]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
M. Murali Krishnan vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506539]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Lakshmidevamma vs Divisional Controller K.S.R.T.C.
[LexDoc Id : 506537]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Kaberi Maitra vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506536]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Rakesh Katara vs High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur
[LexDoc Id : 506325]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Pranab Kumar Dalal vs Balasore Electrical Division and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506545]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
|
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|