First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 63 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kanchan Sanjay Gujar vs Sanjay Bhikan Gujar
[LexDoc Id : 367154]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
R. Vanajarani vs M. Robert
Transfer of case: Transfer petition allowed ex-parte-Plea becoming infructuous-The Supreme Court noted that the transfer petition filed by the respondent-husband to transfer the case at Rajasthan to Tamil Nadu was allowed ex-part [LexDoc Id : 366730]
|
SC |
2009 |
Shikha Saini vs Gurinder Singh Saini and Anr.
Transfer of case-Petition filed by respondent-husband for restoration of conjugal rights-The Supreme Court, noting the transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife praying that the petition filed by the respondent-husband for restoration [LexDoc Id : 366729]
|
SC |
2009 |
Vithal Hivre vs Sumanbai Hivre
[LexDoc Id : 366501]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Amita vs Uday Singh
Transfer of case-Three other cases already being tried where transfer sought-The Supreme Court, taking note of the fact that the appellant’s prayer for transfer of case pending in the Family Court in Indore to the Court of Dist [LexDoc Id : 363169]
|
SC |
2009 |
Arlene Lourdes Ramona Cardoz vs Remiz Cardozo
[LexDoc Id : 362435]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Omprakash and Ors. vs Radhacharan and Ors.
Hindu Succession Act 1956: Applicability of s.15 questioned-Devolution of Self-acquired property of a Hindu female dying intestate-The Supreme Court laid down that s.15(2)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act 1956, providing for a non-obstante clause, carved out an exception viz. when [LexDoc Id : 362135]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rajni Vaid vs Naveen Vaid
Hindu Marriage Act 1955-Transfer of appeal filed under s.9-The Supreme Court transferred the appeal filed under s.9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Panipat to [LexDoc Id : 362637]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rajni Sahay vs Vikash Padmakar
[LexDoc Id : 375060]
|
SC |
2009 |
Kishan vs Ram Kishan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 363005]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Rubina Bano vs Wazid Ali and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 361935]
|
SC |
2009 |
Veronica @ Latha vs V. Philip James
Transfer of case-Divorce petition-The Supreme Court, considering the facts and circumstances surrounding the present case, directed that the divorce petition be transferred from the Fa [LexDoc Id : 361792]
|
SC |
2009 |
Mitali vs Dababrata
Petition seeking transfer of divorce petition-Disposal of petition in terms of settlement arrived at between parties-The Supreme Court disposed the petition seeking transfer of divorce petition in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. The concerned [LexDoc Id : 361803]
|
SC |
2009 |
Shamal Sharad Baride vs Sharad Baburao Baride
[LexDoc Id : 362123]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Sushma Mour vs Ravi Kumar Mour @ Sanjay
Matrimonial suit-Transfer petition allowed-The Supreme Court, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, ordered for transfer of matrimonial suit from the Court of the Additional Dist [LexDoc Id : 361209]
|
SC |
2009 |
Anjali Kapoor vs Rajiv Baijal
Custody of minor child-Welfare of minor child of paramount consideration-The Supreme Court, while considering whether it would be proper to direct the appellant to hand over the custody of the minor child to the respondent, [LexDoc Id : 360990]
|
SC |
2009 |
G. Sekar vs Geetha and Ors.
Validity of Will in question-Concurrent finding-The Supreme Court, considering the question as to whether the execution of the Will had duly been proved, refused to interfere with the concurrent fin [LexDoc Id : 360951]
|
SC |
2009 |
Maitreyee Roy Choudhury (Needas) vs Aveek Roy Chouwdhury
Transfer petition: Allowed by Supreme Court-Initiation before a relevant court-The Supreme Court, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, transferred the matrimonial suit from the Cout of District Judge, Alipore, Cal [LexDoc Id : 360956]
|
SC |
2009 |
Allison Simplicio D' Souza vs Mrunalini D' Souza
[LexDoc Id : 360727]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Fakkirappa Basappa Bhairappanavar and Ors. vs H.F. Bhairappanavar (Dead) through L.Rs. and Anr.
Duty of the high court-Consideration of oral and documentary evidence, Recording of independent findings-The high court, while exercising the power of the first appellate court, which was the final court of fact, was obliged to consider the entire oral an [LexDoc Id : 360254]
|
SC |
2009 |
Vishwanath Bapurao Sabale vs Shalinibai Nagappa Sabale and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359495]
|
SC |
2009 |
Mehul Mahendra Thakkar @ Karia vs Meena Mehul Thakkar @ Karia
[LexDoc Id : 359371]
|
SC |
2009 |
Anu Kaul vs Rajeev Kaul
[LexDoc Id : 359364]
|
SC |
2009 |
Kavita Yadav vs Rahul Yadav
[LexDoc Id : 359174]
|
SC |
2009 |
Gunjan Bansal vs Atul Bansal
[LexDoc Id : 359172]
|
SC |
2009 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
|