Register free!

Forex - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1991 1990 1987 1986 1985 1983 1980 1977 1975 1973 1972 1970 1967 1964 1962 1961 1955 1932 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last Documents Found: 83    Title Forum  Year ABN Amro Bank NV vs JCIT Non-resident company-Rate of tax for foreign company-A.Y. 1992-93 to 1995-96: The assessee was assessable to tax at the rate applicable to a foreign company because it was a non-resident bank incorporate [LexDoc Id : 281614] ITAT (Calcutta) 2005 Jindal Tractebal Power Co. Ltd. vs DCIT Income deemed to arise in India-Services not ancillary to sale of equipment-The assessee had purchased equipment for the power plant from the American company and also from three other Indian concerns. Since the technical serv [LexDoc Id : 321293] ITAT (Bangalore) 2005 Northern Tannery vs Directorate of Enforcement Realisation of export proceeds-Failure to take reasonable steps-Penalty could not be levied upon a person merely because it had failed to take legal action against a foreign buyer for realisation of export proceeds [LexDoc Id : 283673] ATFE (Delhi) 2005 Travel and Rental (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284560] Calcutta HC 2005 DCIT vs Vinarom Ltd. Reasonability of business expenditure-Royalty paid to sister concern, Arm’s length transaction-AY 1998-99 – 2002-03. The assessee company, in pursuance of a licence agreement with a foreign company for some technology and know-how, claimed deduc [LexDoc Id : 315438] ITAT (Bangalore) 2005 Akila A. Meman In Re. [LexDoc Id : 262640] AAR 2005 Manish Bhatia In Re Double Taxation Relief-Income in India of resident of U.A.E.-The assessee, a UAE resident, was not entitled to double taxation relief for the shares sold by him in India, as the Indo-UAE treaty did not apply to [LexDoc Id : 262623] AAR 2005 Abdul Razak A. Meman In Re Double Taxation Relief-Income in India of resident of U.A.E.-The assessee, a UAE resident, was not entitled to double taxation relief for the shares sold by him in India, as the Indo-UAE treaty did not apply to [LexDoc Id : 262616] AAR 2005 Sunder N. Mirpuri vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 240406] Bombay HC 2005 Standard Chartered Bank vs Directorate of Enforcement Offences by Company-Sections related to mandatory imprisonment-Companies could not be immune from prosecution under sections that provided for mandatory imprisonment. The court could pass the normal order dependin [LexDoc Id : 263678] SC 2005 Sonata Software Ltd. vs ITO TDS: Royalty vs Sale of goods-Payment for purchase of software-AY 2000-01 – 2002-03. The assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source in respect of the payment made for import of certain software packages purch [LexDoc Id : 293263] ITAT (Bangalore) 2005 Timeken India Ltd. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 239973] AAR 2005 Briggs of Burton (I) (P) Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 240486] AAR 2005 Anurag Jain, In re [LexDoc Id : 280357] AAR 2005 Rotem Company, In re [LexDoc Id : 262240] AAR 2005 Anurag Jain, In re [LexDoc Id : 261701] AAR 2005 Ceat Tyres vs Director Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 282337] ATFE Delhi 2005 Coastal Roadways Ltd. vs Kanoi Plantation (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 284559] Calcutta HC 2005 Hindalco Industries Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 262176] ITAT (Mumbai) 2005 S. Nepolean vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 285447] ATFE Delhi 2005 X Ltd., The Netherlands, In re Maintainability of application for Advance Ruling-Tax liability of resident-An application by a non-resident foreign company to claim relief under the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement on a loan transaction [LexDoc Id : 262834] AAR 2005 Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. as trustees of Universities Superannuation Scheme, In re [LexDoc Id : 239165] AAR 2005 Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd. In Re Maintainability of application for Advance Ruling-Tax liability of non-resident-The resident assessee's application for an advance ruling pertaining to its tax liability was maintainable. The Authority's jurisdiction was not affec [LexDoc Id : 263376] AAR 2005 Gentex Merchants (P) Ltd. vs DDIT Income deemed to arise/accrue in India-Fee for technical services.-The assessee, an Indian company, was liable to pay tax at 15% on the gross amount of the fees paid as 'fees for technical services'. A company incorp [LexDoc Id : 262838] ITAT (Calcutta) 2005 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 238960] ITAT (Bangalore) 2005   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last