| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 131 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
DDIT vs Safmarine Container Lines N.V.
Income of non-resident from international shipping-Income from incidental activities-AY 2001-02. The assessee was a shipping company of Belgium. It collected customer cargo from Ludhiana in Punjab and brought it to Mumbai port by road [LexDoc Id : 346810]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Dell International Services India (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Dell International Services India (P) Ltd., In re
Royalty or Fees for technical services-Providing Communication through Telecom bandwidth / Circuits-The applicant was an Indian company, which was running call center, data processing and also providing information technology based support services. [LexDoc Id : 343709]
|
AAR |
2008 |
Mohd. Afsar All vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 360355]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Birender Kaur Bajwa vs Enforcement Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 367473]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Afchem Industries vs AD, ED
[LexDoc Id : 365486]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
State of Maharashtra and Ors. vs Zubair Haji Qasim
[LexDoc Id : 343553]
|
SC |
2008 |
Gurmeet Singh vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 359215]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Hardeep Singh vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 359185]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Mannesman Demag Sack AG vs Addl. CIT
Fees for technical services-Supply of designs and supervision, etc. for commissioning of plant- The assessee was a German company and had a Personal Establishment in India. Under an agreement with SAIL it agreed to supply of:
(i) equipment, c [LexDoc Id : 345750]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Bharat Carpets vs Enforcement Directorate
Repatriation of export proceeds-Appeal-An appeal against the Tribunal’s order imposing penalty on the appellant for non-repatriation of export proceeds within stipulated period was dismisse [LexDoc Id : 343219]
|
SC |
2008 |
Asstt. Director of Income Tax vs Chiron Behring GMBH and Co.
Residence of Foreign firm-Tax resident of Germany-The assessee was 'limited partnership' and had paid 'trade tax' on its income in Germany. The said tax was covered under Article 2(3)(a) of DTAA with [LexDoc Id : 346753]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Parsons Brinckerhoff India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Director of Income Tax
Royalty versus Business income-Sale of drawings and designs-A foreign company had made outright sale of drawings and designs to the assessee, an Indian company. The income from such sale of business income of t [LexDoc Id : 345430]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Cushman and Wakefield (S) Pte Ltd. vs DIT
Cushman and Wakefield (S) Pte Ltd., In Re
Income deemed to accrue in India-Referral fee: fee paid for referring customers-The appellant Cushman and Wakefield's was a company incorporated in Singapore. It entered into an agreement with CWI of India that it will refer or re [LexDoc Id : 343015]
|
AAR |
2008 |
Madhusudan Jhun Jhunwala vs Director, Enforcement Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 375852]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Epcos AG
Permanent Establishment: [PE in India]-Subsidiaries and viz-a-viz PE, Support services to PE, Income attributable to PE-AY 2003-04. The assessee 'EAG' was a German Company. It had two subsidiaries in India, viz, 'EIPL and EFPL'. EAG provided support services to the two [LexDoc Id : 354945]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2008 |
Travels and Rental (P) Ltd. vs Director, Enforcement Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 365626]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
DDIT vs Sun Chemicals BV
Income deemed to accrue in India-Sale and purchase of shares of an Indian company by a non resident-AY 2002-03. The assessee a non resident company of Netherlands had suffered loss from purchase and sale of shares of an India company. The AO held tha [LexDoc Id : 344429]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
DDIT vs Thoresen Chartering Singapore (Pte) Ltd.
Income of non-resident from shipping-Income by way of: Commission for shipping-AY 2000-01. The assessee, viz. Thoresen Chartering Singapore (Pte.) Limited was a company incorporated in Singapore. It was not in the business of ope [LexDoc Id : 344116]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Suresh Rohtagi vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 361302]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Syed Latafat Hussain Jeelani vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 361301]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Gurpreet Singh vs Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement
[LexDoc Id : 363128]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
E-Gain Communication (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Arm’s length price: Comparable case-Supply of software to Parent Company-AY 2004-05. The assessee was a 100 percent EOU. It supplied software to its parent company in USA.
FAR Analysis and Net Margin Method (TNNM):< [LexDoc Id : 343358]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2008 |
Star India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
ACIT vs Star India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 346811]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
NIKE Inc. vs ACIT
Income deemed to accrue in India-Purchase of goods in India through liaison office, Purchase in India for export-AY 1999-2000 to AY 2002-03. The assessee was incorporated in USA. It only purchased goods in India through its liaison office in India for the purpose [LexDoc Id : 342036]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 342296]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| |
