| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 294 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ACIT vs NGC Network India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 406522]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Arvind Mills Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 409172]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Transworld Garnet Co. Ltd., In re
Non - discrimination-Denial of benefit of indexation-The discrimination on account of nationality is prohibited but not on account of residence. A foreign national may be resident while an indian nationa [LexDoc Id : 404588]
|
AAR |
2011 |
Pankaj Extrusions Ltd. vs ACIT
Reference to : Dispute resolution panel [DRP]-No variation in Income-A.Y.2007-2008. There was no variation income as per order of TPO. No reference could be made to DRP
S.144C(15)(b) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 408842]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Kartik K. Parekh vs Appellant Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Condonation of delay: Expression ‘within thirty days from today’ meaning within thirty days of passing the order-Appeals filed beyond the period permitted, Delay not condonable-The appellants had contended that Delhi High Court had given liberty to them to file appeals in terms of a judgment of Apex Court wherein liberty was [LexDoc Id : 419480]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
DDIT vs Mc Donald's Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 406335]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Amadeus India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 405807]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Radheshyam Kejriwal vs State of West Bengal and Anr.
Prosecution under FERA, 1973-Exonerate in adjudication proceedings-Where an accused was exonerated on merits in adjudication proceedings, the criminal proceedings cannot continue. If the accused was exonerated on tech [LexDoc Id : 403639]
|
SC |
2011 |
DCIT vs Edelweiss Capital Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 405887]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Clear Plus India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 403818]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Mukesh Kumar Gupta vs State
Restrictions on dealing in foreign exchange: Receipt of illegal gratification-Failure to establish foundational facts to justify prosecution, Exoneration of petitioner on merits, Complaint quashed-The second respondent-Enforcement Directorate had filed a complaint whereunder a disclosure was made by the then captain of South African cricket team [LexDoc Id : 410481]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Jebon Corpn. India Liaison Office vs CIT and Anr.
PE vis-a-vis- Liason off-Liason- office carrying commercial activities-A.Y.2001-2002 to 2006-2007. The assessee was a south Korean company. It’s liason office in India carried out commercial activities like negotiating wi [LexDoc Id : 421292]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
GE India Technology Centre (P) Ltd. vs Dispute Resolution Panel and Anr.
Powers of: Dispute Resolution panel[DRP]-Directions beyond draft order-Ay-2006-2007. The DRP could direct the A.O. to reconsider an issue beyond the draft order of the A.O.
Ss.144(C5) and 144(18) of the Income Tax Ac [LexDoc Id : 419338]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Jas Forwarding Worldwide (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 410905]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Ericsson AB vs Addl. DIT
Duty of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)-Passing speaking order-A.Y. 2007-08. It was the duty of the DRP to pass a speaking order giving cogent reasons.
S. 144C (6), 144C (7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 403321]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
JCB India Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 404593]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Teva India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 435212]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Filtrex Technologies (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 415833]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
ADIT vs Taj T.V. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 405064]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Star Diamond Group vs DDIT
Arm’s Length Price- ALP- Trading-Appropriate Method- Resale Price Method (RPM)-
AY 2004-2005. The assessee’s Indian branch was importing rough diamonds selling them in India. Thus, it was in business of trading. There was no val [LexDoc Id : 404601]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2011 |
ADIT vs Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait
Head Office Expenses of: Non-resident Company-Expenses exclusively incurred for Indian branch-AY 2002-2003. The expenses incurred by Head Office exclusively for Indian branch will not come under the ceiling of S.44C and would be considered unde [LexDoc Id : 404591]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
ACIT vs Essar Steel Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 402989]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2011 |
Tractebel Industry Engg. vs ADIT
[LexDoc Id : 403861]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Colt Technology Services India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 405900]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Infosys Technologies Ltd. vs DCIT
Income deemed to accrue in India-Bandwith charges received v. Royalty or fees, Data communication - Down linking signals-A.Y.2004-2005. The assessee paid bandwidth charges to a non-resident Co. for data communication for downlinking signals in USA. The payment made where [LexDoc Id : 404592]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | Next | Last |
| |
