| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 279 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Transwitch India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 437364]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Deloitte Consulting India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT and ITO
[LexDoc Id : 435546]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corpn. vs DDIT
Antwerp Diamond Bank NV vs Addl. DIT
[LexDoc Id : 428783]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Johnson Matthey India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 435148]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Onmobile Global Ltd. vs ITO
Royalty-Purchase of software-A.Y. 2009-10.
The assessee was providing mobile value added services. It purchased software from a co. of USA. The payment made was royalty and w [LexDoc Id : 434743]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 433588]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs EKL Appliances Ltd.
Business expenditure and ALP-Powers of TPO-A.Y. 2002-03, 03-04.
If the expenditure was incurred for purposes of the business, the TPO could not disallow for the reason that assessee was co [LexDoc Id : 429276]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Uniflex Cables Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 435098]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Vinod M. Chitalia vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 428460]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. vs ADIT and ACIT
Application for advance ruling-Modification of order-The assessee or the deptt. can apply to the Authority for modification of it's order if later events do warrant. The Deptt. on it's own cannot presume [LexDoc Id : 426817]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Rohtak Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 431042]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
'A' Systems, In re
Royalty-Payment received for use of: Product of research: Process or formula developed by research-The applicant is a co. of Germany and ‘A’ group of companies are it’s affiliates. The payment received from group companies under cost allocation agre [LexDoc Id : 433330]
|
AAR |
2012 |
Conexant Systems (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 432573]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2012 |
A Systems, The Netherlands, In re
Royalty-Payment for use of: Process-The applicant a German co. was engaged in contracts for assembly and supervision of paint shop of automobile companies. It was affiliated to companies [LexDoc Id : 429533]
|
AAR |
2012 |
XYZ India, In re.
[LexDoc Id : 427189]
|
AAR |
2012 |
A, In re
Device to evade tax-Non distribution of dividend-Buy back of shares of Indian co. by a non-resident co.-The Indian co. was closely held by a group-holding cos. In USA, Singapore and Mauritius.
There was a scheme of buy back of shares by Indian co. T [LexDoc Id : 427176]
|
AAR |
2012 |
Punnika Parikh, In re
Capital gains–place of accrual-Sale of shares of Indian company-Co. having immovable property in India-The applicant a Dutch citizen held shares of a dormant Indian co. which had ownership of an immovable property in India.
The gains on sale of these s [LexDoc Id : 427103]
|
AAR |
2012 |
Z, In re
Interest vs Capital Gains-Sale of: Compulsory Convertible Debentures-The applicant was a co. incorporated in Mauritius. It held equity shares and CCDs in an Indian co. 'SLT'. It was given an option to sell certain numbe [LexDoc Id : 427273]
|
AAR |
2012 |
Linde AG, In re
Status - AOP-Consortium making a common bid-The 4 companies who formed consortium for bidding for a composite contract were assessable as an AOP.
Art. 3 of DTAA France.
[LexDoc Id : 428288]
|
AAR |
2012 |
ABC, In re
Income deemed to accrue in India-Joint Venture-Turnkey project-composite Indivisible contract-The applicant entered into a joint venture to form a consortium and for executing a turnkey project, under a composite indivisible contract for design [LexDoc Id : 427772]
|
AAR |
2012 |
XYZ, In re
FTS-Payment for-Inspection Services-Testing Services-Verification Services-Certification Services-The applicants were affiliates of x group of companies, having ABC as a parent co. They are providing IVTC services, directly to Indian customers and [LexDoc Id : 426831]
|
AAR |
2012 |
Mainetti India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 435191]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
CIT vs Bovis Lend Lease India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 429534]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
Lenovo India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 429201]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
CIT vs De Beers India Minerals (P) Ltd.
FTS - Fees for Technical Service-Provision of Act v. Provisions of DTAA - Making available technical knowledge, etc.-The Indian Co. was prospecting for minerals. A Co. of Netherland provided it with data of geographical survey. The services provided would not enable [LexDoc Id : 431051]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
