Register free! 
Forex - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 304   
Title Forum  Year
ITO vs Pubmatic India (P) Ltd. @ Komli Media (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 447549]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Mahindra Bt Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd. vs DIT and Ors. Maintainability of: Application for advance ruling-Violation of SEBI's guidelines by assessee-The application for advance ruling could not be rejected on the ground that the transactions raised in the questions were in breach of SEBI's guidelin [LexDoc Id : 449532]
HC (Bombay) 2013
DCIT vs Petro Araldite (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 459169]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Sargent and Lundy, LLC, USA vs Addl. DIT [LexDoc Id : 455174]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Alstom Projects India Ltd. vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 449709]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Arun Ramanlal Sura, Shashikant Munshilal Katiyar and Rajesh Narendra Mewawala vs CC [LexDoc Id : 447999]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2013
Takshay Jagdish Kumar Gandhi vs N.H.L Municipal Medical College [LexDoc Id : 454425]
HC (Gujarat) 2013
ACIT vs GE India Industrial (P) Ltd. Powers of Tribunal-Stay of penalty - proceedings-A.Y. 2004-05.
The Tribunal has the power to grant stay of penalty proceedings while the quantum appeal was pending before it.
S. 254(1) of [LexDoc Id : 453516]
HC (Gujarat) 2013
Taj Sats Air Catering Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 450853]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Royal Star Jewellery (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 462643]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
ADIT vs Simatech Shipping Forwarding LLC [LexDoc Id : 450960]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
DCIT vs Sahara India Mass Communication Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 455137]
ITAT (Delhi) 2013
Syscom Corpn. Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 451739]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
DCIT vs Lumax Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 451738]
ITAT (Delhi) 2013
DDIT vs Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Ltd. FTS v. commission-Commission for mobilizing bank deposits-A.Y. 2001-02, 2002-03.
The assessee bank received commission, arranger's fees from SBI, for mobilizing deposits. The fees received was not fees f [LexDoc Id : 454912]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
CIT vs Agnity India Technologies (P) Ltd. ALP - Selection of Comparables-Giant company vis-à-vis captive Unit-A.Y. 2006-07.
A giant co. could not be taken as a comparable to a captive unit of parent co. and who assumed only limited risk.
S. 92C of th [LexDoc Id : 453129]
HC (Delhi) 2013
Capital International Emerging Markets Fund vs DDIT [LexDoc Id : 452051]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Actis Advisers (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 451761]
ITAT (Delhi) 2013
Microsoft Regional Sales Corpn. vs Addl. DIT [LexDoc Id : 451760]
ITAT (Delhi) 2013
Hughes Systique India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 448386]
ITAT (Delhi) 2013
Zinser Textiles Systems (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 459859]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
K.M. Katheeja vs Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, Competent Authority, Smugglers and Foreign Exchange and Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators [LexDoc Id : 454426]
HC (Chennai) 2013
Penfort Ltd. vs DDIT [LexDoc Id : 465092]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2013
Pino Bisazza Glass (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 456469]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2013
Sabic Innovative Plastic India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT ALP - CUP method when not appropriate-Internal comparables-A.Y. 2008-09.
The TPO could not apply CUP method to take profit margin of internal comparables. CUP method was not applicable because this method [LexDoc Id : 448730]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2013
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last