| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 494 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Lal Mani Mishra and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 510002]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Sudhakara Infratech (P) Ltd. vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Ors.
Cancellation of letter of intent-Notice Inviting Tenders-Petitioner sought to quash a memo issued by respondents cancelling letter of intent issued in favour of petitioner on account of failure to comply wit [LexDoc Id : 509695]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2017 |
Sanjeev Malhotra and Ors. vs B.S. Promoter and Developers
[LexDoc Id : 510018]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
State Construction Integrated Works vs National Highways Authority of India and Ors.
Acceptance of bid-Non-responsive-Whether, respondent was justified in accepting bid of respondent No. 2 for consideration when tender of respondent No. 2 was allegedly technically non [LexDoc Id : 509694]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Eaton Industries (P) Ltd. vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 517348]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2017 |
DCIT vs Devgen Seeds and Crop Technology (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 517347]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2017 |
Citicorp Investment Bank vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 516872]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Red Hat India (P) Ltd. vs DDIT
[LexDoc Id : 516769]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Oriflame India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Selection of most appropriate method-Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rule 10B (2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Selection of comparabels-Whether, the AO/ TPO erred in the determination of the arm's length price of the Appellant's international transactions with its associated enterprise [LexDoc Id : 516732]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
RayBan Sun Optics India Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 516729]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
ACIT vs Hemant Sachdev
Deletion of addition-Payment for club membership-Whether, the CIT (A) erred in deleting the addition made under section 40A(3) being payment made to club in cash. Held, the assessee has produced the [LexDoc Id : 516728]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Gopal Chandra Jaiswal vs Birla Tyres and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509677]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Fulena Construction (P) Ltd. vs East Central Railway and Ors.
Rescind of contract-Cost component-Petitioner's contract has been rescinded and by letter, risks and costs component in fresh tender notice has been attached on shoulders of petitioner. [LexDoc Id : 509675]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P) Ltd. vs Airports Authority of India (Southern Region) and Ors.
Contractual powers of government-Judicial Review-Whether, first respondent rightly rejected objections raised by petitioner with regard to documents submitted by second respondent pursuant to tender [LexDoc Id : 509674]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
MSC Software Corpn. India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 517349]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2017 |
Christian Dior Trading India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
DCIT vs Christian Dior Trading India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 516772]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Ciena India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 516766]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Willis Processing Services India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 516534]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Trianz Holdings (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Selection of comparables-Transfer pricing adjustment-Assessee who was engaged in software service activities challenged the directions of DRP to included certain comparables. Whether, the comparables sel [LexDoc Id : 516667]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2017 |
ACIT vs Curam Software International (P) Ltd.
Curam Software International (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Selection of comparables-Transfer pricing adjustment-Adjustment made by the TPO to the total income in connection with its international transaction was challenged. Whether, DRP erred in directing certai [LexDoc Id : 516666]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2017 |
Piaggio and C.S.p.A vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 516654]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2017 |
Pashupati Castings Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Levy of license fee-U.P. Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961. Excessive.-Petitioners challenged to levy of license fee by Zila Panchayat, Aligarh in terms of bye-laws framed by it under provisions of U.P. Kshetra Panchayat [LexDoc Id : 509685]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Singh Caterers and Vendors and Ors. vs Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509693]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Ghanshyam Lal vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Validity of charges-Conscious judicial mind-Whether, lower authorities was justified in held that no material has been produced to wipe out charges made against petitioner rather only tried to s [LexDoc Id : 509676]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
DCIT vs Informatica Business (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 516447]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
