Register free! 
Forex - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 551   
Title Forum  Year
G. Robin Sitharanjan vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 521028]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Oaknet Healthcare (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 539483]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2018
DCIT vs Nirvana Business Solutions (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 539482]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2018
Success Niryat (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 521034]
HC (Calcutta) 2018
Honshu Buildcon (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs North Delhi Municipal Corpn. Violation of clauses-Malafide conduct-Petition was filed against proceedings of cancellation of letters by NDMC. Whether, petitioners had violated clauses of NIT, if they were found to ha [LexDoc Id : 521030]
HC (Delhi) 2018
Envirad Projects (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 521027]
HC (Allahabad) 2018
India Medtronic (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Disallowance of payments-Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Allowable expenses-Whether, the disallowance of payments made to doctors on ground that same were in violation of MCI guidelines was justified. Held, Medical Council of [LexDoc Id : 522547]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
Wells Fargo Real Estate Advisors (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Rejection of comparable-Determination of Arms Length Price-The order of the TPO of rejecting all the comparables selected by the assessee and the selection of three comparables i.e. Motilal Oswal Advisers Indi [LexDoc Id : 520492]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
DCIT vs Sopariwala Exports

Sopariwala Exports vs DCIT
Deletion of Additions-Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Validity of reassessment proceedings-Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case the CIT (A) erred in deleting the addition made. Held, although Section 153A does not say that add [LexDoc Id : 520491]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
Rakesh Construction Co. vs Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and Ors. Earnest Money Deposit-Non submission-Petitioner had challenged action of respondent in disqualifying petitioner for non submission of Earnest Money Deposit. Whether, respondent should be [LexDoc Id : 521032]
HC (Gujarat) 2018
Varian Medical Systems International India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. Rejection of tender-Non essential requirement-Petition was filed under grievance that Petitioner’s bid was rejected against respondent. Whether, respondent was justified by law by not furnished a [LexDoc Id : 521035]
HC (Delhi) 2018
United Health Group Information Services (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT [LexDoc Id : 524447]
ITAT (Delhi) 2018
Schlumberger India Technology Centre (P) Ltd. DDIT [LexDoc Id : 524446]
ITAT (Pune) 2018
JCIT vs Michelin India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 524445]
ITAT (Delhi) 2018
ACIT vs Jacob Engg. India (P) Ltd.

Jacob Engg. India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 524444]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
Gameloft Software (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 524443]
ITAT (Hyderabad) 2018
Franklin Templeton International Services India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 524442]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
DCIT vs Astral Poly Technik Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 524440]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2018
DCIT vs Abicor Binzel Production India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 524439]
ITAT (Pune) 2018
Abacus Distribution Systems India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 524438]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
ITO vs Copal Research India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 524441]
ITAT (Delhi) 2018
DCIT vs Cargill India (P) Ltd.

Cargill India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Deletion of addition-Addition on account of managerial remuneration-Whether, the CIT (A) was justified in deleting the addition on account of managerial remuneration. Held, letter of approval has emanated from governme [LexDoc Id : 524297]
ITAT (Delhi) 2018
DCIT vs Akzo Noble Car Refinishes India (P) Ltd.

Akzo Noble Car Refinishes India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 522217]
ITAT (Delhi) 2018
Intec Billing Ireland vs ADIT [LexDoc Id : 522176]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2018
Tata Metaliks Ltd. vs State of Tripura and Ors. Rejection of bid-Non-responsive bidder-Technical bid of petitioner was rejected as non-responsive bidder. Whether, technical bid of petitioner was rightly rejected as non-responsive bidder. [LexDoc Id : 520375]
MISC 2018
 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | Next | Last