Register free! 
Forex - Judgement
[ 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 52   
Title Forum  Year
Nandlal B. Maloo vs ED [LexDoc Id : 383678]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Parekh Platinum Ltd. vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 367925]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Mohan, Proprietor of Kandan Mohan Exports vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 375850]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Pashun Impex vs ED [LexDoc Id : 379857]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Bhanubhai Paramanand Soni vs ED [LexDoc Id : 383696]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
E. Fathima Beevi vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 373245]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Vinod Solanki vs UOI Confession statement under coercion-Burden of proof-The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order of tribunal and ordered to refund the amount recovered from the appellant. The tribunals’ order did not [LexDoc Id : 353696]
SC 2008
Coca Cola India Inc. vs ACIT Computation of Arms length price-Opportunity of being heard before reference to TPO-Before making a reference to the TPO, the AO need not grant an opportunity of being heard.

S.92CA of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 353786]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
Dallah Albaraka (Ireland) Ltd. vs Pentasoft Technologies Ltd. Winding up: Just and equitable ground-Petitioner bound to convince court of availability of alternative remedy-When a petitioner invoked a just and equitable ground under s.443(2) of the Companies Act 1956 to wind up a company, he should convince the court not [LexDoc Id : 393347]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Munilal H. Shah vs ED [LexDoc Id : 372830]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Bihar State Financial Corpn. vs Chhotanagpur Minerals and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352368]
SC 2008
Mohd. Salim Khan vs ED [LexDoc Id : 384644]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
S.S. Kothari vs Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 367922]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Nemi Chand Jain and Vikram Singh vs ED [LexDoc Id : 351681]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Shekhar Goel vs Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 363131]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Trade Wings Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 353005]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2008
UOI vs Classic Credit Ltd. Maintainability of writ petition-Existence of alternative remedy-The High Court held that the writ petition against an order of pre-deposit under s.35 of the FERA Act 1973 was maintainable. The condition precedent f [LexDoc Id : 353935]
HC (Delhi) 2008
UOI vs Classis Credit Ltd., Panther Fincap and Management Service Ltd. and Kartik K. Parek [LexDoc Id : 349725]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Sri Lakshmi Prasanna Agencies vs Dy. CC [LexDoc Id : 362699]
HC (Madras) 2008
Nazneen vs Director of Enforcement [LexDoc Id : 362267]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Suborno Bose and Zoom Enterprises Ltd. vs Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 385083]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
Suborno Bose vs Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange

Zoom Enterprises Ltd. vs Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Offence by company: Liability of managing director prior to taking charge-Offence for violation of s.10(6) of FEMA continuous-The contravention of Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 or Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 had created a strict liability. The violation of the [LexDoc Id : 347889]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
B.D. Gupta vs ED [LexDoc Id : 362225]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Associated Builders and Developers vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 363655]
ATFE (Delhi) 2008
Monotosh Saha vs ED and Anr. Undue hardship: Not merited by conduct of claimant-Undue hardship caused when hardship not warranted by circumstances-The Supreme Court observed that under Indian conditions the expression ‘undue hardship’ normally related to economic hardship. Undue meant something, [LexDoc Id : 345553]
SC 2008
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last