Register free! 
Forex - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 54   
Title Forum  Year
Shirishkumar Kulkarni vs CIT Maintainability of application for Advance Ruling-Withdrawals from Individual Retirement Account-The applicant had been residing and working in USA since December 1993. During the course of his employment, his employer deposited a part of his sala [LexDoc Id : 306991]
AAR 2006
R and B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT FBT on non-resident company-Travelling expenses of expatriate staff- The applicant, a non-resident company, was engaged in the business of providing mobile offshore drilling rigs. The expenses incurred by it on transp [LexDoc Id : 315338]
AAR 2006
UOP LLC vs Addl. DIT Powers of Tribunal-Admission of: additional evidence-AY 2001-02. The Tribunal could admit additional evidence which was relevant for a just decision and come into possession of the department after filin [LexDoc Id : 325167]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
UPO LLC vs Additional Director of Income Tax Powers of Tribunal-Procedure for admission of additional evidence- AY 2001-02. The tribunal was empowered to admit the additional evidence not only if it required such evidence to ‘enable it to pronounce judgment’ b [LexDoc Id : 318027]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
ACIT vs Motorola India Electronics (P) Ltd. and Motorola India Electronics (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 331073]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2006
International Hotel Licensing Company S.A.R.L. vs DIT Inernational Taxation Income arising in India-Payment to non-resident for business promotion abroad-The applicant was a non-resident company engaged in business promotion by way of international advertisements, marketing and sale for a chain of hotel [LexDoc Id : 306992]
AAR 2006
Meenu Sahi Mamik : In Re Maintainability of application for Advance Ruling-Exemption for industry set up in backward areas of a State-The applicant, a non-resident, sought to establish a manufacturing unit for drugs in Himachal Pradesh for which an Indian company proposed to get thei [LexDoc Id : 305500]
AAR 2006
British Gas India (P) Ltd. vs CIT Liability for TDS-Salary taxed abroad-The salary taxed abroad would be liable for tax deduction at source in India.

S.192(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 304535]
AAR 2006
AT and S India (P) Ltd. vs CIT Income deemed to accrue in India-Payment for technical services-The applicant was an Indian company and a subsidiary of an Austrian company. As per an agreement, the applicant was required to reimburse the remunera [LexDoc Id : 304691]
AAR 2006
IMT Labs India (P) Ltd. vs CIT Income deemed to accrue in India-Payment of royalty for licence of software-The applicant, an Indian company, entered into an agreement with a non-resident company, which had no permanent establishment in India, for which it s [LexDoc Id : 304536]
AAR 2006
Angel Garment Ltd. vs DIT Income deemed accrue in India-Liaison office for collecting information and samples-The applicant company, incorporated in Hong Kong, proposed to set up a liaison office in India for collecting information and samples for export of te [LexDoc Id : 304692]
AAR 2006
A. Natrajan vs ED Dealing in foreign exchange-Confession and documentary evidence, Imposition of penalty-The penalty imposed on the appellant for illegally purchasing and selling of foreign exchange beyond the prescribed rates of the RBI, in contravention [LexDoc Id : 317091]
ATFE (Delhi) 2006
Dresdner Bank AG vs Addl. CIT Expenses relating to exempt income-Duty of AO-The AO was duty bound to identify the expenses relating to exempt income for the purpose of disallowance under s.14A of the Income Tax Act 1961. LexDoc Id : 304021]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2006
Sony India (P) Ltd. vs CBDT International transactions: CBDT’s instructions-Determination of arm’s length price-AY 2002-03. The Finance Act 2001 had introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act 1961 to enable the AO to determine arm’s length price in case of in [LexDoc Id : 303534]
HC (Delhi) 2006
V. Phillip Babu vs Director, Enforcement Directorate [LexDoc Id : 318872]
ATFE (Delhi) 2006
Kotak Mahindra Primus Ltd. vs DDIT Income deemed to accrue in India-Payment for data processing-AY 2001-02. The payment made by the assessee, an Indian company, to an Australian non-resident company for data processing of the information supplied [LexDoc Id : 305828]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2006
Dhanalakshmi vs Standard Chartered Bank Enforcement of security interest-Invocation of writ jurisdiction-A writ petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India against enforcement of security interest under the SARFAESI Act 2002 was dismissed beca [LexDoc Id : 317092]
HC (Chennai) 2006
Prem Mehra vs V.K. Baranwal SAFEMA 1976-Forfeiture of Property-Proceedings for forfeiture of property acquired by a detenu through ill-gotten gains could continue against the relatives of the detenu even after his [LexDoc Id : 302939]
HC (Delhi) 2006
S.M.A. Razvi vs ED Dealing in foreign exchange-Confession and documentary evidence-The offense of illegally dealing in foreign exchange, contravening the provisions of s.9(1)(a) and s. 8(1) of FEMA 1973 was proved against the appella [LexDoc Id : 317090]
ATFE (Delhi) 2006
Sheraton International Inc. vs DDIT Validity of reassessment-Change of opinion vs Non-filing of return- The question of forming or changing of an opinion did not arise, as the assessee had not filed its return of income for any of the relevant years. T [LexDoc Id : 306153]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
Y. Venkatrayulu vs RBI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 307043]
HC (Chennai) 2006
Bank of Madurai Ltd. vs Director, Enforcement Directorate Restrictions on payments-Loan to non-resident-The Enforcement Directorate had rightly imposed a penalty on the appellant-bank for contravening the provisions of s.9(1)(a) and s.9(1)(d) of FERA 197 [LexDoc Id : 305218]
ATFE (Delhi) 2006
Population Council Inc. vs DIT Fringe Benefit Tax-Non-resident charitable organisation-The applicant institution, a non-resident charitable organisation having its office in India, was liable to pay fringe benefit tax, even if it had no [LexDoc Id : 301556]
AAR 2006
Asian PPG Industries Ltd. vs ED Restriction on dealing in Foreign Exchange-Imposition of penalty-The adjudication order that levied penalty on the appellant for contravening the provisions of s.8(3) and s.8(4) of FERA 1973, was set aside. The remi [LexDoc Id : 317457]
ATFE (Delhi) 2006
Om Prakash Mittal and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. Appeal against imposition of penalty-Constitutional validity of s.19 of the FEMA 1999-A writ petition questioning the constitutionality of s.19 of the FEMA 1999 was dismissed. Merely because the amount of court-fee required to be paid m [LexDoc Id : 316438]
HC (Delhi) 2006
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last