Anil vs Rajendra
Refusal of court to refer dispute to arbitration-Either party to proceedings not entitled to invoke s.11(6) after finality of such decision-Once a judicial authority took a decision under s.8(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 declining to refer the dispute pending before it t [LexDoc Id : 478813]
Pooja Ravinder Devidasani vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Dishonour of cheques: Putting criminal law into motion for civil disputes impermissible-Superior courts to maintain purity in administration of justice and disallow abuse of court process-Putting the criminal law into motion was not a matter of course. To settle the scores between the parties, which were more in the nature of a civil di [LexDoc Id : 474633]
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Nokia India (P) Ltd.
Taxability of Battery Charger: Battery Charger to be treated as a part of cell phone-Concessional rate of tax on Battery charger-Assessing Authority held battery charger as a separate item which was liable to be taxed at general rate i.e. 12.5% and not at concessional rate appli [LexDoc Id : 474632]
Mahadeo Narayan More and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra
Appeal against setting aside of acquittal: Dying declaration-Doctor certifying recording of dying declaration in his presence, No reason to doubt veracity of dying declaration, Appeal dismissed-In an appeal against setting aside of acquittal of appellants, the Supreme Court noted the testimony of prosecution witness (doctor), who at the begin [LexDoc Id : 474631]
State Tr. Insp. of Police vs A. Arun Kumar and Anr.
Framing of charge against an accused-Principles as regards scope of s.227 and s.228 of CrPC 1973-The trial judge, while considering the question of framing the charges under s.227 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 had the undoubted power to sift [LexDoc Id : 474628]
Pricol Ltd. vs Johnson Controls Enterprise Ltd. and Ors.
Appointment of arbitrator: Applicant submitting to jurisdiction of sole arbitrator appointed by SIAC-Application seeking appointment of arbitrator under joint venture agreement between parties dismissed-The Singapore Chamber of Commerce (SCC) mentioned in clause 30.2 of the joint venture agreement by and between the parties was not an arbitration inst [LexDoc Id : 474501]
Mukesh Kumar vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Award of sentence and conviction under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985-Sentence reduced to the period of sentence already undergone having regard to totality of circumstances-The appellant had been convicted under s.20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imp [LexDoc Id : 474344]
Discovery Wel. Mangt. Ser. (P) Ltd. vs Padmini Engg. (P) Ltd.
Delisting of company: Requirements with respect to listing of securities on a recognised stock exchange-Level of public shareholding fixed for continuous listing at 20 percent, 10 percent limit of public shareholding inapplicable in view of rule 19(2)-Rule 19(2)(b) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957 provided that at least 10 percent of each class or kind of securities should be offe [LexDoc Id : 482323]