Register free! 
SC Cases - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 730   
Title Forum  Year
Anil vs Rajendra Refusal of court to refer dispute to arbitration-Either party to proceedings not entitled to invoke s.11(6) after finality of such decision-Once a judicial authority took a decision under s.8(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 declining to refer the dispute pending before it t [LexDoc Id : 478813]
SC 2014
Kumod Kumar and Anr. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474719]
SC 2014
State of Punjab vs Jagga Singh [LexDoc Id : 478812]
SC 2014
Pooja Ravinder Devidasani vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. Dishonour of cheques: Putting criminal law into motion for civil disputes impermissible-Superior courts to maintain purity in administration of justice and disallow abuse of court process-Putting the criminal law into motion was not a matter of course. To settle the scores between the parties, which were more in the nature of a civil di [LexDoc Id : 474633]
SC 2014
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Nokia India (P) Ltd. Taxability of Battery Charger: Battery Charger to be treated as a part of cell phone-Concessional rate of tax on Battery charger-Assessing Authority held battery charger as a separate item which was liable to be taxed at general rate i.e. 12.5% and not at concessional rate appli [LexDoc Id : 474632]
SC 2014
Mahadeo Narayan More and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Appeal against setting aside of acquittal: Dying declaration-Doctor certifying recording of dying declaration in his presence, No reason to doubt veracity of dying declaration, Appeal dismissed-In an appeal against setting aside of acquittal of appellants, the Supreme Court noted the testimony of prosecution witness (doctor), who at the begin [LexDoc Id : 474631]
SC 2014
State of Punjab vs Labh Singh [LexDoc Id : 474630]
SC 2014
Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and Ors., Assam Public Works and All Assam Ahom Association and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474629]
SC 2014
State Tr. Insp. of Police vs A. Arun Kumar and Anr. Framing of charge against an accused-Principles as regards scope of s.227 and s.228 of CrPC 1973-The trial judge, while considering the question of framing the charges under s.227 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 had the undoubted power to sift [LexDoc Id : 474628]
SC 2014
S. Seshachalam and Ors. Etc. vs Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Ors.

Elder Lawyers Association and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 474502]
SC 2014
Pricol Ltd. vs Johnson Controls Enterprise Ltd. and Ors. Appointment of arbitrator: Applicant submitting to jurisdiction of sole arbitrator appointed by SIAC-Application seeking appointment of arbitrator under joint venture agreement between parties dismissed-The Singapore Chamber of Commerce (SCC) mentioned in clause 30.2 of the joint venture agreement by and between the parties was not an arbitration inst [LexDoc Id : 474501]
SC 2014
Harish Kumar vs State of Haryana [LexDoc Id : 474500]
SC 2014
K.K. Sharma vs High Court of Delhi and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474488]
SC 2014
S. Dinesh Kumar vs State [LexDoc Id : 478815]
SC 2014
Ajay Kumar Pal vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 478814]
SC 2014
Mukesh Kumar vs State of Madhya Pradesh Award of sentence and conviction under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985-Sentence reduced to the period of sentence already undergone having regard to totality of circumstances-The appellant had been convicted under s.20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imp [LexDoc Id : 474344]
SC 2014
Prabin Ram Phukan vs State of Assam [LexDoc Id : 482271]
SC 2014
Velaxan Kumar vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474346]
SC 2014
Collector of Land Acquisition and Ors. vs Andaman Timber Industries [LexDoc Id : 474345]
SC 2014
Discovery Wel. Mangt. Ser. (P) Ltd. vs Padmini Engg. (P) Ltd. Delisting of company: Requirements with respect to listing of securities on a recognised stock exchange-Level of public shareholding fixed for continuous listing at 20 percent, 10 percent limit of public shareholding inapplicable in view of rule 19(2)-Rule 19(2)(b) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules 1957 provided that at least 10 percent of each class or kind of securities should be offe [LexDoc Id : 482323]
SC 2014
Shlok Bhardwaj vs Runika Bhardwaj and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474271]
SC 2014
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. vs Khuman Singh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 474268]
SC 2014
Baluram vs P. Chellathangam and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474267]
SC 2014
Rajiv Chowdhrie (Huf) vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 474164]
SC 2014
G.M. (Operations) S.B.I and Anr. vs R. Periyasamy [LexDoc Id : 474163]
SC 2014
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last