Register free! 
SC Cases - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
1
Documents Found: 20   
Title Forum  Year
Secretary to Govt. Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat and Anr. vs A. Singamuthu [LexDoc Id : 508615]
SC 2017
A. Kanthamani vs Nasreen Ahmed [LexDoc Id : 508614]
SC 2017
State Bank of India vs Smita Sharad Deshmukh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 508619]
SC 2017
JSW Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. vs Kakinada Seaports Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 508618]
SC 2017
Municipal Council and Ors. vs Aruna Saini [LexDoc Id : 508616]
SC 2017
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Raghunath Bhagwan Satpal [LexDoc Id : 508617]
SC 2017
DIT vs A.P. Moller Maersk A.S. [LexDoc Id : 508306]
SC 2017
CCE vs Stesalit Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 508308]
SC 2017
B.K. Pavitra and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 508307]
SC 2017
P. Sivanandi vs Rajeev Kumar and Ors. and State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507982]
SC 2017
APGENCO vs P. Ram Babu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507981]
SC 2017
State of Haryana and Anr. etc. vs Mohinder Singh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507980]
SC 2017
Jagdamba Devi vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507979]
SC 2017
Ivy C.da. Conceicao vs State of Goa and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507978]
SC 2017
Haryana Urban Dev. Authority and Ors. vs Orchid Infrastructure Developers (P) Ltd. Rejection of bid-Reserve price-Whether, decree of High Court was justified regarding findings of rejection of bid in auction. Held, reasons have been mentioned in rejection order an [LexDoc Id : 507977]
SC 2017
Gopal and Sons (HUF) vs CIT Deemed Dividend-Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Beneficial shareholder.-Whether, in view of settled principle that HUF cannot be registered shareholder in a company and hence could not have been both registered and benefic [LexDoc Id : 507270]
SC 2017
H.V.P.N Ltd. and Ors. vs Bal Govind Direction of reinstatement with back wages: Termination on account of involvement in criminal case-Termination in accordance with Service Rules, No justification in granting back wages- Whether the direction to reinstate the respondent with 50 percent back wages was valid. Held, the respondent happened to be terminated from serv [LexDoc Id : 507269]
SC 2017
Pepsu Road Transport Corpn. vs Amandeep Singh and Ors. Pensionary benefits: Period provided for submitting option not dependent on personal service of notice-Benefits of CPF Scheme received without any protest, Pension scheme not opted for- Whether notice was required to be personally served to an employee before the period of six months as provided in regulation 4 of the PEPSU Road [LexDoc Id : 506947]
SC 2017
Yash Pal and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. Regularization of services: Porters in Indian Army-Directions issued to proposed scheme- Whether the petitioners, who had been engaged as porters in the Indian Army as casual labourers and daily wage employees in the border areas, we [LexDoc Id : 506948]
SC 2017
Allahabad Bank and Ors. vs Krishna Narayan Tewari Dismissal from service: Discretion in not remanding the matter properly exercised-No allegation or evidence to show the extent of loss suffered due to alleged misconduct- Whether the order quashing the removal of respondent and directing the appellant to provide all service or retiral benefits to the petitioner wa [LexDoc Id : 506946]
SC 2017
 
1