| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 140 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Garg and Co. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384643]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
VSE Stock Services Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 383694]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Tata Tea Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 397346]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Goldstone Exports Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 385489]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
M.Z. Khan vs SEBI, Burren Energy India Ltd., Unocal Bharat Ltd., Hindustan Oil and Exploration Co.
[LexDoc Id : 374759]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Dhaval Mehta vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374701]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Kotak Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374758]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Himani Patel vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374704]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Idea Cellular Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 381938]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Probir Kumar Misra vs Ramani Ramaswamy and Ors.
Promoters of company: Liability of promoters-Civil liability for misstatements in prospectus-A reading of s.62(1) made it clear that for any misstatement in the prospectus every person who was a promoter of the company could be made liable for [LexDoc Id : 395341]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Deepak Mehra vs SEBI, Bharti Airtel Ltd. and MTN Group Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 374700]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Vivek Nagpal vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374772]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Jatin Manubhai Shah and Varsha Jatin Shah vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374756]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Hamlet Holding II ApS, DISA Holding II A/S, DISA Holding A/S and DISA Holding AG vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374703]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
ENPEE Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374763]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Kunnamkulam Paper Mills Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Anr.
Offer of rights shares with a right to renounce shares: Shares issued to more than 50 persons-Jurisdiction on Central Government in relation to companies not coming within description of s.55A(a) and s.55A(b), No right to SEBI to usurp such jurisdiction, No presumption of jurisdiction by depending on any constructive provisions-The first petitioner, a public limited company, had declared an offer for a right issue of its shares to its shareholders with a right to renounce the [LexDoc Id : 433628]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
Bhuvanendran vs LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 385084]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
Chanchal Jain vs SEBI and Ors.
Powers of SEBI: Challenge to circular issued by SEBI-Circular not ultra vires-The petitioners were distributors who sold mutual funds to investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India had issued a new circular under which [LexDoc Id : 375397]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Mithani Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374760]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Weizmann Ltd., Weizmann Financial Resources (P) Ltd., Om Mitra Securities Ltd., Mitra Fidelity Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Adjudicating Officer
[LexDoc Id : 374582]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
N. Narayanan vs SEBI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 372832]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Eight Capital Master Fund Ltd., Spinnakar Global Opportunity Fund Ltd., Spinnakar Global Emerging Markets Fund Ltd. and Spinnakar Global Strategic Fund Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374572]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Cheneena Impex (P) Ltd., CEE-AN Impex (P) Ltd., Smitasha Impex (P) Ltd. and Parekha Exim (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374571]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Meena Shah vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374575]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
AMS Finance and Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 374570]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| |
