| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 195 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Pan Asia Advisors Ltd. and Arun Panchariya vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438736]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Ajmera Associates Ltd. vs BSE Ltd., Bharat Tambe, HDFC Securities Ltd., Bipin Babulal Shah (HUF), Niki Jitendrabhai Shah, Prabha Jacob Nainan and Viralkumar Rameshchandra Mistry
[LexDoc Id : 438239]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Palco Recycle Industries Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438735]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Mercury Fund Management Co. Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438722]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Almondz Global Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438243]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
IP holding Asia Singapore Pte. Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 434665]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Atlanta Share Shopee Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 452734]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Fairwealth Securities Ltd. @ Fairwealth Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438265]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
DSE Financial Services Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438260]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Anr.
Contempt law: Object and purpose-Preservation of sanctity of administration of justice and integrity of pending proceeding-Purpose of contempt law was not only to punish. Its object was to preserve the sanctity of administration of justice and the integrity of the pending [LexDoc Id : 431115]
|
SC |
2012 |
Pantaloon Retail India Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 452733]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Jagdish R. Jani vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 437600]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Salasar Stock Broking Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438753]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Khandwala Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438279]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Bhavook Tripathi vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438251]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Prudential Stock and Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 437490]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI and Anr.
Powers of SEBI-Exercise of jurisdiction over public companies issuing shares or debentures to 50 or more but not complying with s.73(1) by not listing its securities on a recognised stock exchange-SEBI could exercise its jurisdiction under s.11(1), s.11(4), s.11A(1)(b) and s.11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 and regulati [LexDoc Id : 430608]
|
SC |
2012 |
Chartered Capital and Investment Ltd., Mohib Noman Khericha and Manoj Kumar Ramrakhyani vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438253]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Alfa Fiscal Services (P) Ltd., Hardik Bagadia and Bhavesh Sheth vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438240]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Balchandra K. Patel vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 433088]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Naman Securities and Finance (P) Ltd. @ Shree Naman Securities and Finance (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438728]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
M.P. Vora Shares and Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438282]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
A.G. Shares and Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 433085]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Tushar Jani (HUF), Bhairavi T. Jani, Ashok K. Jani and Ors. vs SEBI, Board of Trustees of HSBC Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund and HSBC Asset Management India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 438757]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Rikhav Securities Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438749]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| |
