Register free! 
SEBI - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 137   
Title Forum  Year
Kapil Chatrabhuj Bhuptani vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453928]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Sandeep Badriprasad Agrawal vs Securities and Exchange Board of India Maintainability of PIL against running of BC scheme by jewellery shop owners-Petition dismissed as without substance-PIL was filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take action against the jewellery shop owners, who were running BC scheme according to which t [LexDoc Id : 456912]
HC (Bombay) 2013
Rajendra Jayantilal Shah and Rajesh N. Jhaveri vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 454030]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Earnest Healthcare Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453927]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
A.G. Shares and Securities Ltd. vs SEBI, U.P. Stock Exchange Ltd. and U.P. Stock Exchange Association Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 453926]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
HB Securities Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453925]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Vidhya Finvest Ltd., Sanwarmal Agarwal and Shankarlal Agarwal vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453924]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Pan Asia Advisors and Arun Panchariya vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453921]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Rose Valley Real Estates and Construction Ltd. and Gautamkundu vs SEBI, Prashant Saran and R.P. Singh [LexDoc Id : 453923]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Sajeve Deora vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453922]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Reliance Industries Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453920]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Dhirendra Rajitram Shukla vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453919]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
R.R. Chokhani Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453918]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Finquest Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453917]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Tower Infotech Ltd. vs UOI Appointment of chartered accountant to look into deposits obtained by petitioner-Injunction order passed restraining petitioner from operating its bank accounts without previous leave and from dealing with its immoveable properties-In a petition praying for appointment of a chartered accountant to look into the deposits obtained by the petitioner before the SEBI approved the fina [LexDoc Id : 455658]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
Axes Multi Developers Ltd. vs State of West Bengal Anomalies in functioning of petitioner: Monies collected from depositors without obtaining permission or sanction therefor from relevant authorities-Appropriate authorities directed to take appropriate steps or lodge complaints against the petitioner or any person connected therewith-Notices were issued to the SEBI and the regional director at the behest of petitioner and on the representation that the petitioner was interested in [LexDoc Id : 455657]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
RMG Alloy Steel Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453916]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Standard Chartered Bank vs Dharminder Bhohi [LexDoc Id : 455984]
SC 2013
Rajesh N. Jhaveri vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453915]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 465830]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453914]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Hemant Sheth, Bhavesh Pabari and Shree Radhe vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453913]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
S.P.J. Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453911]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Vitro Commodities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453910]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
Vibha Sharma and Jitendra Kumar Sharma vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 453909]
SAT (Mumbai) 2013
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last