| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | Last |
| Documents Found: 50 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kosha Investments Ltd. vs SEBI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 488564]
|
SC |
2015 |
Sai Prasad Properties Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 488714]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Sai Prasad Foods Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 488713]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
SEBI vs IKISAN Ltd. and Kakinada Fertilizers Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 488838]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. vs Moneywise Media (P) Ltd., Sucheta Dalal and Debashish Basu
[LexDoc Id : 488302]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Citrus Check Inns Ltd. and Omprakash Basantlal Goenka and Ors. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 487043]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Master Share and Stock Brokers Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 487047]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Kiev Finance Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 487045]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Ideal Hotels and Industries Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 487044]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Ankur Chaturvedi vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 487042]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Rose Valley Hotels and Entertainments Ltd. and Gautam Kundu and Ors. vs Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Ors.
Rule of exhaustion of alternative remedy not one of compulsion but of discretion-Writ petition entertainable when petitioner able to show exceptional case-Even though rule of exhaustion of alternative remedy was a rule of discretion and not one of compulsion, it was difficult to fathom any reason why the [LexDoc Id : 484924]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Financial Technologies India Ltd. vs SEBI, MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. and MCX-SX Clearing Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 484954]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 484953]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Rose Valley Real Estate and Constructions Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Failure to refer to other scheduled offences in letter-Such failure not ipso facto invalidating the letter in view of saving provision engrafted in s.68-Failure to refer to other scheduled offences apart from the one under the Security and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 in the impugned letter would n [LexDoc Id : 480403]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Vasantlal Mohanlal Vora and Arcadia Share and Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI
Gains from self-trading in shares-Section 15HA of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prevention of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003. Violations of SEBI’s provisions-Penalties imposed on appellants (brokers) under Section 15HA of the act on the ground that Appellants due to self-trades and resultant monetary profit [LexDoc Id : 478866]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Sachi Aggarwal and Sneha Aggarwal vs Securities and Exchange BOI, Axis Bank Ltd. and Neeli Aggarwal
[LexDoc Id : 478865]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Ltd. vs NSEI Ltd., BSE Ltd. and SEBI
Suspension of trading activities -Regulation 55A of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996. Non-Compliance of Clause 41of Listing agreement-Appellant challenged the notice issued by the NSE for suspending trading in securities on account of non- compliance with Clause 41 of the Listing Agr [LexDoc Id : 478862]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Kirtibhai Chhaganbhai Patel and Aditya Yogeshbhai Patel vs SEBI
Delay in making disclosure of shareholding by directors-Section 15A (b) of the SEBI Act, 1992. Regulation 13(2) of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. Imposition of penalty-Appellants challenged the order of Adjudication Officer (AO) of SEBI of imposition of penalty of rupees five lakh under regulation 13(2) of Regulation [LexDoc Id : 478863]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
BSE Ltd. vs Indian Clearing Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 478861]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Vipras Corpn. Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 478867]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Anil Agrawal vs SEBI
Acquisition of shares-Regulation 30 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011. Section 15A (b) of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Noncompliance of Takeover Regulations -Appellant challenged the imposition of penalty for failure to comply with Regulation 30(2) read with Regulation 30(3) of Takeover Regulation. Whether, [LexDoc Id : 478860]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Praveen Mohnot, Priyanka Singhvi, Anita Ravichandran, N. Ravichandran, Hemant R. Patel and Hemant Patel HUF vs SEBI
Prohibition in dealing in security market-Violation of principle of natural justice-Appellants being aggrieved by the order of SEBI prohibiting them in operating in security market challenged the order on ground that it was passed in [LexDoc Id : 478864]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Purshottam Budhwani vs SEBI
Unlawful gain out of initial public offer (IPO)-Basis of order of disgorgement towards unlawful gain-The appeal against order of disgorgement towards unlawful gain arose due to certain activities connected with Initial Public Offer (IPO) of 13 compani [LexDoc Id : 476644]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Purshottam Budhwani vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 476643]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Videocon International Ltd. vs SEBI
Amendment of forum: Availment of appellate remedy before amendment constituting vested right-Change in forum constituting procedural amendment if appellate remedy not availed of and forum of appellate remedy altered by amendment -An amendment of forum would not necessarily be an issue of procedure. Where the question was of change of forum, it ceased to be a question of procedu [LexDoc Id : 476131]
|
SC |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | Last |
| |
