Register free! 
SEBI - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Last
Documents Found: 87   
Title Forum  Year
SEBI vs Kishore R. Ajmera Justification in interfering with penalty: Absence of direct proof showing involvement of sub-broker-Degree of proof required to hold brokers or sub-brokers liable for fraudulent or manipulative practices-Whether the tribunal was justified in interfering with penalty by holding that in the absence of any direct proof or evidence showing the involvement [LexDoc Id : 494368]
SC 2016
Bipin Jayant Thaker and Ors. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 494310]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Omkam Commodities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 494314]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Falcon Tyres Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992: Imposition of maximum penalty under section 15HB-Statement of appellants in relation to minutes of meeting not disbelieved, No finding recorded on subsequent statement, Impugned order set aside-Whether the assessing officer was justified in imposing maximum penalty of Rs.1 crore imposable under section 15HB of the Securities and Exchange Boar [LexDoc Id : 494313]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Vijay J. Thakkar vs SEBI SEBI Act 1992: Justification for imposition of penalty-Lesser penalty imposed on similarly situated persons without any justification, Impugned order set aside-Whether imposition of penalty on the appellant for violating the provisions contained in the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fr [LexDoc Id : 494226]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Royal Twinkle Star Club Private Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI Restrain order: Schemes closed long before issuance of show cause notice-Schemes closed voluntarily, Substantial amount refunded to investors, Time to repay dues to members extended-Whether the order mainly restraining the appellant from collecting any money from investors or from launching or carrying on any Collective Investment [LexDoc Id : 493606]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Citrus Check Inns Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI Continuance of directions contained in ex-parte interim order: Companies having completely different and exclusive legal identities-Appellant's undertakings on oath, Direction to make a without prejudice application seeking registration-Whether SEBI by its confirmatory order was justified in continuing the directions contained in the ex-parte interim order until further orders and in [LexDoc Id : 493603]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Ankur Chaturvedi and Brijlaxmi Leasing and Finance Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 493602]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Thyrocare Diagnostics (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 493353]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Vibgyor Allied Infrastructure Ltd., Rabindra Nath Dey, Raja Bhadra and Rana Bhadra vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 493076]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Vasudev Ramchandra Kamat, Ketan Babulal Shah and Jigar Praful Ghoghari vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 493075]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
Nirmal Singh Bhangoo vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 492520]
SAT (Mumbai) 2016
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Last