Reebok India Co. and Anr. vs Gomzi Active
Passing off-Interim injunction-An appeal against the grant of an interim injunction restraining the appellants from using the trade slogan ‘I AM WHAT I AM’ along with their trade ma [LexDoc Id : 302242]
HC (Karnataka)
2006
Eveready Industries India Ltd. vs Societe des Produits Nestle S.A
Registration of Trademark-Condonation of delay-An application for extension of time for opposing the registration of trade mark 'CLASSIC' was allowed. The application for extension was made beyond [LexDoc Id : 304176]
Dhanalakshmi Cottage Industries vs Gopala Krishna Company and Anr.
Registration of trademark-Prior user, deceptive similarity-An opposition to the application for registration of the trademark 'Lotus' was rightly rejected, as the appellant was unable to establish its claim. T [LexDoc Id : 301252]
IPAB
2006
Hari Chand Shri Gopal vs Kishore Zarda Factory and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Opposition to registration-An appeal against the Assitant Registrar’s order that dismissed the appellant’s objections while granting registration of trademark ‘100’ in the respo [LexDoc Id : 301251]
Brooke Bond India Ltd. vs Girnar Exports
Registration of Trademark-Condonation of delay-An application for extension of time for opposing the registration of trade mark 'Red Label' was allowed. The application for extension was made beyon [LexDoc Id : 304174]
RegTM (Calcutta)
2006
Paras Pan Products (P) Ltd. vs SSG Pharma Ltd.
Registration of Trademark-Deceptive similar colour scheme on labels-An application for registration of a label mark consisting of the words ‘HARFANMOLA’ and ‘NAGRAJ’, and the device of two children was rejected. The re [LexDoc Id : 303033]
Srilab Breweries (P) Ltd. vs Scotch Whisky Association
Registration of Trademark-Trademark – descriptive words-The registration of trade mark consisting the words 'Rare blend' for the goods wine, spirits and liquors was refused. The mark was highly descriptive [LexDoc Id : 304175]
Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi vs UOI and Ors.
Trademark Rules 2002-Rule 47(6) struck down as null and void-Rule 47(6) of the Trademark Rules 2002 was struck down as null and void because it was clearly ultra vires s.21(1) of the Trademarks Act 1999. The pro [LexDoc Id : 303021]
HC (Bombay)
2006
Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Pfizer Ltd. and Anr.
Opposition to registration of trademark-Service of proper notice-An appeal filed against the Assitant Registrar’s order that treated the appellant’s opposition as abandoned and granted registration to the respondent [LexDoc Id : 301248]
IPAB
2006
Jagdish Pershad Ladda vs K. Ganesh Nadar and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Claim of prior user-The mark 'SUPER XTRA' was registered in favour of respondent and the opposition against the registration was dismissed. The appellant claimed to be a [LexDoc Id : 301247]
Apex Laboratories Ltd. vs Zuventus Health Care Ltd.
Infringement of trademark-Phonetically and visually dissimilar marks-An interim injunction issued against the respondents restraining it from using the trademark 'Zinconia' was rightly vacated. Both the parties dealt i [LexDoc Id : 304167]
HC (Chennai)
2006
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs Lupin Laboratories Ltd. and Anr.
Infringement of trademark-Jurisdiction of Fast Track Court-The restriction imposed under s.134 of the Act regarding institution of suit in the inferior court to District Court was in respect of judicial exerci [LexDoc Id : 299075]
