First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 146 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Intel Corpn. vs Dinakaran Nair and Ors.
Infringement of trademark-Permanent injunction-A permenent injunction was granted in the plaintiff's favour, restraining the defendant form using the trademark 'ARTINTEL' as it was deceptively simi [LexDoc Id : 297609]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Poysha Power Generation (P) Ltd. vs Doctor Morepen Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 296029]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Mawana Sugars Ltd. vs Panalink Infotech Ltd.
Domain names-Identical names-The domain names and registered in the name of the respondent were directed to be transferred to the complainan [LexDoc Id : 294722]
|
WIPO |
2006 |
International Association of Lions Clubs vs National Association of Indian Lions and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 299076]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Ors. vs Zee, Kathmandu and Ors.
Passing off-Identical domain name-Permanent injunction was issued against the defendant restraining it from using domain names starting with the word “Zee” as they were identical to th [LexDoc Id : 294765]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Dabur India Ltd. vs Wipro Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 296026]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Aftab Tobacco Products vs Amanat Tobacco Gul Manufacture
Opposition to registration of trademark-Filing of evidence in support of opposition-A review petition filed to recall the Registrar’s order by which opposition to the registration of a trademark was treated as abandoned was dismissed. [LexDoc Id : 296021]
|
RegTM (Delhi) |
2006 |
Bharati Cellular Ltd. and Anr. vs Jai Distillers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 301250]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Tata Motors Ltd. vs Cavincare (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Filing of evidence-Allowing extension of time-The order that disallowed the appellant from filing its opposition against registration of the trademark on account of delay in filing of evidence was [LexDoc Id : 296022]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Rajive Paul vs Princeson Jose and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Dishonest concurrent user-The order that rejected the registration of the trademark 'Chungath Prince Jewellery' was upheld. The impugned mark was similar to the mark of the pri [LexDoc Id : 296020]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Vidya Bhushan Jain vs Collector of Customs (Sea-imports) and Anr.
Infringement of trademark-Bar on import of goods -Writ petition was filed to put a bar on import of goods infringing the petitioner's registered trademark. Certain representations had been made to the [LexDoc Id : 294719]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
La Chemise Lacoste and Anr. vs R.H. Garments and Ors.
Infringement of trademarks-Perpetual injunction-Perpetual injunction was issued against the defendant, restraining it from making counterfeit products and infringing the plaintiff's trademarks 'CHEM [LexDoc Id : 294762]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Prabha Singh Jaswant Singh vs B. Mohammed Yousuff and Anr.
Trademarks Act 1999-False Representation of the mark-An appeal against an order that held the appellant guilty of an offence committed under s.107 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 for misrepresentation was di [LexDoc Id : 301249]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Worldwide Brands Inc vs Dayavanti Jamndas Hinduja and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Opposition to registration-The opposition filed against the registration of trademark “Camel Collection” was rejected in absence of evidence that indicated the commercial public [LexDoc Id : 296019]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Glaxo Group Ltd vs Voltas Ltd and Ors.
Trademark-Refusal of registration-An application to register a trademark 'Volmax' was dismissed as it was phonetically, visually or structurally similar to that of the first respondent [LexDoc Id : 294723]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Santosh Devi and Ors. vs Ramesh Kumar and Ors.
Unregistered trade mark-Perpetual injunction-The plaintiff was not entitled to the grant of perpetual injunction in its favour, restraining the defendant from using the trademark ‘Pooja Udyog’ be [LexDoc Id : 317422]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
Asian Paints (I) Ltd vs Balaji Paints and Chemicals and Ors.
Infringement of copyright, passing off-Permanent injunction-A decree of Rs.3 lacs was passed in the plaintiff’s favour and against the defendant which had tried to adopt trademarks such as 'SUPER ASIAN', 'GREA [LexDoc Id : 297838]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Ashish Tea Company and Anr. vs Miraj Products (P) Ltd. and Anr.
Infringement of trademark-Perpetual injunction-A perpetual injunction was granted in the plaintiff’s favour, restraining the defendant from using the trademark ‘MIRAJ’ that was identically similar [LexDoc Id : 317423]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
C.T. John, Videon Industries vs Prodip Kumar Dooth and Anr.
Registration of Mark-Appeal dismissed-The appeal against the Deputy Registrar's decision to reject the application for the registration of the trade mark 'VIDEON' was rejected as the impu [LexDoc Id : 301300]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Kennametal Gmbh and Co KG vs Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks
Refusal to register trademark-Absence of reasoned order-The Assitant Registrar of Trademarks rejected an application for registration of trade mark 'engineering your competitive edge' without any reasoned [LexDoc Id : 301299]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
ISS A/S vs Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks
Refusal to register trademark-Absence of reasoned order-The Assitant Registrar of Trademarks rejected an application for registration of trade mark 'ISS' without any reasoned order. Consequently, the appeal [LexDoc Id : 301297]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and Ors. vs Har Prasad Gupta and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 299070]
|
SC |
2006 |
Subhash Gupta vs Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr.
Removal of Registered Trademark-Conversion of proprietary firm into a private limited company-The appeal against the removal of the registered trademark from the Trademark Register was upheld. The Registrar had removed the mark from the registe [LexDoc Id : 296024]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
K.K. Talwar vs Jagdish Chand Gupta and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Fair trial-Registration of mark “Parko under class 9 was allowed after the appellant, who had objected the registration, failed to appear on the date of hearing. [LexDoc Id : 296023]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Asian Paints (I) Ltd. vs Ved Prakash Srivastava and Ors.
Infringement of copyright, passing off-Permanent injunction-Permanent injunction was issued against the defendant restraining it from manufacturing synthetic enamels, paints under the trademarks “ARSIAN/NECOLIT [LexDoc Id : 296017]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
|