| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 77 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi vs Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal
[LexDoc Id : 504426]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Guru Kirpa Overseas and Ors. vs Hero Exports
Restrained from export-Section 40 of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Deceptive Similar Trade Mark.-District Judge restrained appellant/defendant from exporting to Bangladesh and certain other countries bicycles, bicycle parts and bicycle components [LexDoc Id : 504422]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Perry Beverages India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Bharat Chandiramani
[LexDoc Id : 504420]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
A.D. Padmasingh Isaac and Ors. vs V. Senthil Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 504418]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Levi Strauss and Co. vs Ankit Sharma and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 503774]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and Ors. vs Just Lifestyle (P) Ltd.
Grant of injunction-Section 29 (4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Infringement of registered trade mark-The Plaintiffs sought the temporary injunction restraining the Defendant from using the word 'VOGUE' as part of their impugned trade mark "JUST IN VOG [LexDoc Id : 503772]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
People Interactive India (P) Ltd. vs Vivek Pahwa and Ors.
Protection to domain name as trade mark-Infringement to trade mark-The Plaintiff prayed to restrain the Defendants from using the domain name secondshaadi.com in any manner, including as part of the domain name for th [LexDoc Id : 503780]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Inphase Power Technologies (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs ABB India Ltd.
Continuation of temporary injunction-Infringement of patent-Respondent filed suit for injunction restraining the defendants from misappropriating or distributing plaintiffs confidential information and also res [LexDoc Id : 503771]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Times Publishing House Ltd. vs Financial Times Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502960]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Vardhman Buildtech (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Vardhman Properties Ltd.
Deceptive similarity-Section 29(9) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Aid of Section.-Single Judge restrained appellants from using mark/brand name 'VARDHMAN' or 'VARDHMAN PLAZAS' or corporate name 'VARDHMAN' or any other mark which was [LexDoc Id : 502032]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bright Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs MJ Bizcraft LLP and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501536]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Exide Technologies vs Exide Industries Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501539]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CavinKaare (P) Ltd. vs Panchaksharam Guru Moorthy and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501537]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. and Ors. vs Essar Industries and Ors.
Taking of additional documents on record-Allowing such documents to be taken on record to endlessly delay trial, Application dismissed-
Whether additional documents could be allowed to be taken on record. Held, though the courts had undoubtedly been liberal in past in allowing do [LexDoc Id : 501214]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. vs R.S. Sales Corpn. and Ors.
Restraining infringement of registered trademark-Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Permanent injunction.-Plaintiff filed suit for seeking decree of permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered trademark, rendition of accounts and delive [LexDoc Id : 501095]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Abhay Agarwal and Ors. vs Puranmal Goods (P) Ltd.
Passing off, trademark and copyright infringement: Every action in passing off an action in deceit-Defendants having independent registration and use, Adoption of mark not dishonest, No prima facie case made for grant of injunction-
Whether the suit seeking a restraint order against the defendant on a cause of action in passing off in relation to a trade mark combined with a [LexDoc Id : 501194]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
A.D. Padmasingh Isaac and Ors. vs K. Satheesh Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 501193]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Allied Blenders and Distillers (P) Ltd. vs R.K. Distilleries (P) Ltd.
Infringement of Trade Mark.-Order VII Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Permanent injunction.-Plaintiff filed suit for permanent injunction, restraining defendant from infringing/passing off trade mark; copyright of plaintiff, unfair competitio [LexDoc Id : 501097]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Raymond Ltd. vs Raymond Pharmaceutical (P) Ltd.
Injunctions-Section 29(4) of Copyright Act, 1957. Notice of motion.-Plaintiffs sought injunctions restraining Defendants, from infringing plaintiffs' registered mark 'Raymond' ("the Mark") in any manner including by us [LexDoc Id : 501107]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Agrigold Foods and Farm Products Ltd. and Ors. vs Agrigold Healthcare (P) Ltd.
Permanent injunction.-Deceptive similarity.-Plaintiff sought permanent injunction, restraining defendant from passing off their goods or their business as business of plaintiffs', by using expre [LexDoc Id : 501096]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Garware Polyester Ltd. vs 3M Co. and Ors.
Infringement of trade mark-Deceptive Use-Plaintiff in suit for trade mark infringement and passing off claimed that Defendants' use of the expression 'SUNCONTROL' or 'SUN CONTROL' in their ma [LexDoc Id : 500395]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Ashland Licensing and Intellectual Property LLC and Ors. vs Dinesh Mahajan and Ors.
Decree for permanent injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiffs files suit for permanent injunction to restrain defendants from infringing trademark 'VALVOLINE' of plaintiffs by using trademark 'TAVOLINE [LexDoc Id : 500393]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Aqua Pump Industries and Ors. vs Puneet Mehta Trading as Electricals System and Controls
Infringement of trade mark-Deceptive similarity-Interim injunction had been granted restraining defendant, from manufacturing, selling, offering and advertising for sale using Trade Mark TECHNOPLUS [LexDoc Id : 500392]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha vs Deepak Mangal and Ors.
Infringement of trademark-Section 22 of Limitation Act, 1963. Delayed in filling suit-Plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, damage, delivery up against four defendants, in [LexDoc Id : 500405]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
S. Gopi vs Jai Sai Enterprises
Infringement of trademark: Marks of both parties visually similar-Plaintiff entitled to relief of permanent injunction, Prayer for surrender of entire stocks of unused offending marks not granted-Whether the defendant had infringed the trade mark of plaintiff and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the decree as prayed for. Held, including th [LexDoc Id : 499591]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last |
| |
