| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 122 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Turning Point Institute (P) Ltd. vs Turning Point
Granting interim injunction-Action of passing off-Plaintiff has filed an interim application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 Code of Civil Procedure to seek interim injunction against the defendant for us [LexDoc Id : 518648]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Skipper Ltd. vs Akash Bansal and Ors.
Dishonest use of registered trademark-Section 35 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999. Rights of registered proprietor-The petitioner claims to be the proprietor of the word mark "BANSAL" alleged dishonest use of the said mark by the respondents. Whether, the adoption [LexDoc Id : 518647]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Harman Overseas and Ors. vs Dongguan TR Bearing Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Grant of leave of appeal-Clause XIV of the Letters Patent. Joinder of Cause of action-Whether, the Single Judge was justified in granting leave under Clause XIV of Letters Patent. Held, there was no material to come to a conclusion that [LexDoc Id : 518645]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Pidilite Industries Ltd. vs Poma-Ex Products
Grant of injunction in case of infringement-Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 28(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Infringement of trademark and copyrights-The plaintiff sought injunction against the defendant, its partners, its directors, proprietors, servants, subordinates, representatives, stockists, d [LexDoc Id : 518646]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Galderma S.A. vs Velite Healthcare
[LexDoc Id : 518644]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
RSPL Health (P) Ltd. vs M.D. Chemicals
[LexDoc Id : 513768]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) vs Mergury Elegtronigs and Ors.
Modification of order-Payment of interim deposit-Suit filed for permanent injunction against the defendants for restraining them from infringing the eight Indian "standard essential patents" of the p [LexDoc Id : 513771]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Indovax (P) Ltd. vs Merck Animal Health and Ors.
Suit for passing off-Section 20 of Civil Procedure Code. Section 134(1) (c) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Territorial jurisdiction of Court-Applicant/Defendant challenged the territorial jurisdiction of Court to entertain plaintiff’s suit for passing off. Whether, the court has jurisdictio [LexDoc Id : 513766]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
United Biotech (P) Ltd. vs Biochem Pharmaceuticals Industries (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trademark-Plaintiff sought permanent injunction restraining the Defendants their directors, partners or proprietor as the case may be, their assigns in business [LexDoc Id : 513770]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs Mohammed Zaheer Trading as Gujarat Mobiles and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513769]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Marico Ltd. vs Jay Kumar Bangeja and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513767]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Impresario Event Marketing Co. (P) Ltd. vs Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality (P) Ltd.
Stay of proceedings-Section 124 (1) (b) (ii) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Validity of registration of the trade mark-Petitioner sought reliefs against the respondent infringing the company's registered trade mark "Impresario". Respondent/defendant company entered app [LexDoc Id : 513765]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
Shree Nath Heritage Liquor (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Octaga Green Power and Sugar Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513480]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
MEX Switchgears (P) Ltd. vs Omex Cables Industries and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513478]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Kantaben Manibhai Patel vs Premchandbhai Venidas Patel and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513477]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Hettich Marketing Undvertriebs Gmbh and Ors. vs Anushka Gill and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513476]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Black Ticket Films vs Walter Philip and Ors.
Territorial jurisdiction of high court: Grant of leave to file suit-Substantial part of cause of action arising in Mumbai, Leave rightly granted-Whether the material part of cause of action in the suit had arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court of Bombay and, if so, leave [LexDoc Id : 513142]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Burberry Ltd and Ors. vs 99 Labels.Com and Ors.
Suit for permanent injunction: Infringement of trade mark-Plaintiffs' evidence gone unrebutted, Plaintiffs held entitled to compensatory and punitive damages-Whether the suit filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, passing off, damages and delivery up etc. could be allowed. He [LexDoc Id : 513143]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Mondelez Foods (P) Ltd. vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513479]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Monish Gujral and Ors. vs G. Kiran Kumar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513481]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Kalpataru Properties (P) Ltd. vs Kalpatharu Housing (P) Ltd.
Territorial jurisdiction of high court: Choice to bring a suit based on section 20 of CPC-Rights under section 134(2) of Trademarks Act 1999 not eroded, curtailed or restricted-Whether the High Court of Bombay had jurisdiction to receive, try and dispose of the instant suit. Held, because the plaintiff had multiple offices, h [LexDoc Id : 513147]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Radheshyam Tourism vs Radheshyam Travels (P) Ltd.
Appeal against grant of interim injunction: Prior use of trademark-Respondent having better case of prior use, Impugned order not interfered with-Whether the appeal filed against grant of interim injunction in favour of the respondent could be allowed. Held, it was well settled that prior use of [LexDoc Id : 513145]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Yahoo Inc. vs Rinshad Rinu and Ors.
Suit for permanent injunction: Infringement of trade mark-No plausible explanation for adoption of identical mark, Compensatory and punitive damages awarded-Whether the suit filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, passing off, dilution and tarnishment, unfair competition, dam [LexDoc Id : 513146]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Kajal Aggarwal vs Managing Director, V.V.D. and Sons (P) Ltd.
Copyright Act 1957: Suit for compensation and permanent injunction-Copyright vesting with defendant, Plaintiff's case not established, Suit dismissed-Whether the suit claiming compensation and permanent injunction on the ground that the defendant had misused the ad film shot under the terms of the a [LexDoc Id : 513144]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Ors. vs Anser Pasha
Suit for permanent injunction: Infringement of trade mark-Use of phonetically and visually similar trade mark, Defendant held liable for infringement-Whether the suit for permanent injunction, infringement of trade mark and accounts of profit against the defendant for using the mark EXON as a part o [LexDoc Id : 513141]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| |
