| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 122 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Gujarat Co-op Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. and Ors.
Restraining the television commercial from telecasting-Generic disparagement of a rival product-The Plaintiff manufacturer of frozen desserts and ice creams under the mark "KWALITY WALL'S". Filed suit against Defendants for restraining them from [LexDoc Id : 512251]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
TTK Healthcare Ltd. vs S.R. Bio Future Labs
Entitlement to permanent injunction-Infringement of trade mark-Permanent injunction sought against defendant from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks in the Woodwards Gripe water label, logo containin [LexDoc Id : 512252]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Subhas Chand vs Mahesh Chandra Agrawal and Ors.
Infringement of copyright-The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Injunction against using similar label-Whether, the design of plaintiff's trademark as also the labels, boxes/containers registered under Act, 1988 was infringed by the defendants. Held, pl [LexDoc Id : 512665]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Piccadily Agro Industries Ltd. vs Ashok Jain and Ors.
Maintainability of suit for infringement of trademark-Order VII Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Territorial Jurisdiction of Court-Defendants filed their application under Order VII Rule 10, CPC to challenge the maintainability of plaintiff’s suit for infringement of trademark on [LexDoc Id : 512662]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Hari Chandn Shri Gopal and Ors. vs Bal Gopal Fragrances
[LexDoc Id : 512657]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
HT Media Ltd. and Ors. vs Navneet Chaturvedi and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trademark-Plaintiffs filed suit for permanent injunction restraining defendants from infringing the trademark 'HINDUSTAN TIMES'. Whether, the plaintiff was enti [LexDoc Id : 512658]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Paramount Surgimed Ltd. vs Paramount Bed India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Grant of interlocutory injunction-Use of deceptively similar mark-The use of the mark 'PARAMOUNT' by the defendants was disputed by the Plaintiff and prayed for grant of interim injunction was allowed in his favour. [LexDoc Id : 512661]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Mehar Wing Services (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Jindal Restaurant
Permanent injunction-Section 17 of the Trademarks Act. 1999. Infringement of trademark-The plaintiff alleged infringement of its trademark/name 'PINCH OF SPICE' by defendant. Whether, the trademark 'PINCH OF SPICE' and ‘PINCH OF SALT’ ar [LexDoc Id : 512660]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Cureway Drugs and Ors. vs Sahajanand Health Care and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512654]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Louis Vuitton vs Gaurav Bhatia and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trade mark-Suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the defendants, restraining them from infringing its trademark, copyright an [LexDoc Id : 512666]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Shammi Narang and Ors. vs Pindrop Music App (P) Ltd.
Infringement of trademark-Section 28 (3) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Setting aside of ex-parte injunction-Plaintiff was aggrieved by the defendant's adoption of the registered trademark/trade name of the plaintiff 'PINDROP'. Defendant filed application for [LexDoc Id : 512664]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
JSB Cement LLP vs Assam Roofing Ltd. and Ors.
Interlocutory injunction-Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Infringement of registered trade marks-Whether, the respondents had made out a case for an interlocutory injunction on the ground of infringement and the reasons furnished for the order imp [LexDoc Id : 512659]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Parul Homoeo Laboratory (P) Ltd. vs Royal Group
[LexDoc Id : 512667]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Ram Krishan and Sons Charitable Trust vs ILM Consulting (P) Ltd.
Ad-interim injunction-Section 28 of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Infringement of trade mark-Plaintiff alleged the use of deceptively similar trademark by the defendants and prayed that the defendant, it's directors, principles, proprietor, pa [LexDoc Id : 512663]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
G.D. Foods Mfg. India (P) Ltd. vs Zihawa Foods (P) Ltd.
Maintainability of suit-Order 7 Rule 11 Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Jurisdiction of Court-The defendant has sought the dismissal of the suit alleging that since the plaintiff was not the registered owner of the trademark TOPS, his suit for [LexDoc Id : 512656]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
McDonalds India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CTT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512124]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Dart Industries Inc. vs Cello Plastotech
Entitlement to interim injunction-Designs Act, 2000. Infringement of designs-Plaintiff filed suit for infringement of designs and passing off and prayed for interim injunction. Whether, the interim injunction sought against def [LexDoc Id : 512655]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Tarun Jain vs Manoj Jain and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringing the trade mark-Plaintiff has instituted this suit inter alia for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the trade mark 'NIKKY POINT' of the [LexDoc Id : 511144]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Foodcraft India (P) Ltd. vs Saurabh Anand Trading and Ors.
Interim injunction-Irreparable loss-Whether, defendant should be restrained by an interim injunction from using name 'HAUS' for his delivery outlets. Held, plaintiff has been able to est [LexDoc Id : 511141]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Ajanta Pharma Ltd. vs Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 511139]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Sandisk Corpn. vs Ramjee and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trademarks-Plaintiff filed present suit against defendants for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks and copyright, delivery up, rendition [LexDoc Id : 511143]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Pest control India (P) Ltd. vs Pest Control Innovative (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 511142]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Carlsberg Breweries vs Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
Ad-interim injunction-Novelty-Plaintiff sought relief in application is to sought an ad-interim injunction against defendant, restraining it from using design/bottle, which is clai [LexDoc Id : 511140]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Tosiba Appliances Co. (P) Ltd. vs Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba and Ors.
Compensation in monetary damages-No cause of action-Whether, plaintiff able to prove any cause of action against defendants. Held, plaint not disclosing any cause of action against defendants No. 2 to 4 [LexDoc Id : 511145]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
DPS World Foundation and Ors. vs Delhi Public School Society
[LexDoc Id : 510697]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| |
