Register free! 
Trademark - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 153   
Title Forum  Year
Khannan Polymers vs Bairathi Shoes Co. (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 410007]
HC (Rajasthan) 2010
Pernod Ricard S.A. France vs Rhizome Distillers (P) Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 413831]
IPAB 2010
Kamadhenu Realtors (P) Ltd. vs Kamadhenu Ispat Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 413780]
IPAB 2010
Sachdeva and Sons Industries (P) Ltd. vs Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 408235]
IPAB 2010
Glaxo Group Ltd. and Anr. vs S.D. Garg and Ors. Trademark infringement: Exclusive rights to registered proprietor to use of trademark-Conditions precedent for infringement-The provisions of s.28 of Trade Marks Act 1999 gave exclusive rights to its registered proprietor, to the use of the trademark in relation to the good [LexDoc Id : 400333]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Eveready Industries India Ltd. vs Sanajay Chadha and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 400332]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Ashok Leyland Ltd. vs Blue Hill Logistics (P) Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 415386]
HC (Chennai) 2010
Sunstar Overseas Ltd. vs Rameshwar Dass Garg [LexDoc Id : 413779]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Okasa Pharma (P) Ltd. vs Win-Medicare Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 413835]
IPAB 2010
Bling Telecom (P) Ltd. vs Micromax Informatics Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 403797]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Cipla Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 403794]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Financial Times Ltd. vs Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 400136]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Aktiebolaget Volvo and Ors. vs Kishore Purohit and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 399854]
HC (Delhi) 2010
ITC Ltd. vs Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 403787]
HC (Calcutta) 2010
Lacoste and Anr. vs Global Impex India CA [LexDoc Id : 415383]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Jain Electronics vs Cobra Cables (P) Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 398872]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Pfizer Products and Anr. vs Vijay Shah and Ors. Trademark infringement vis--vis Passing off: Exclusive right to registered proprietor to use trademark-Necessary for plaintiff to prove that its registered trademark used by defendant, No such use required to be established in an action for passing off-The provisions of s.28 of Trade Marks Act 1999 gave to the registered proprietor of the trademark the exclusive right to the use of the trademark in r [LexDoc Id : 398854]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Amir Chand Jagdish Kumar (Exports) Ltd. vs Hindustan Hing Supplying Co. [LexDoc Id : 398847]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Lakshmi Venkataramana and T. Varada Raj Pai vs P. Kiran Kumar [LexDoc Id : 410000]
HC (Karnataka) 2010
Timber Land Co. vs A. Vijay and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 398491]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Aman Resorts Ltd. vs Deepak Narula and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 408233]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Times Internet Ltd. vs Belize Domain Whois Service Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 397842]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Infosys Technologies Ltd. vs Jupiter Infosys Ltd. and Anr. Pre-requisite that applicant to be a person aggrieved-Applicants grievance to continue till application decided-The Supreme Court held that for filing application under s.46 or s.56 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 or a composite application under both sections, it w [LexDoc Id : 397733]
SC 2010
Nutrine Confectionery Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Andhra Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 411542]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2010
Marico Ltd. vs Agro Tech Foods Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 397566]
HC (Delhi) 2010
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last