| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 127 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ved Prakash Garg vs Gurudev Industries
[LexDoc Id : 534726]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Mahle Filter Systems India (P) Ltd. vs Mobis India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534725]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Horlicks Ltd. and Ors. vs Heinz India (P) Ltd.
Comparative advertisement-Sections 29 (8)and 30 Trade Marks Act, 1999. Honest use of mark-Whether, comparative advertisement was in terms of provisions of Act. Held, primary objective of Sections 29(8) and 30(1) of Act is to allow comparati [LexDoc Id : 534450]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Carlsberg Breweries A/S vs Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
Composite Suit-Order I and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Joinder of parties and cause of action-OPINION OF MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Whether, composite suit in relation to infringement of registered design and for passing off can be entertain [LexDoc Id : 534449]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs Brexsun Pharma (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 534684]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Citigroup Inc. and Ors. vs Citicorp Business and Finance (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Contempt of courts orders-Order 39 Rule 2A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Article 215 of Constitution of India, 1950. Punishment-Neither name of defendant companies has been changed or struck off nor cost has been deposited as order by Court. Directors of defendant companies to [LexDoc Id : 534165]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Flamagas S.A. and Ors. vs Ojas B. Shah
[LexDoc Id : 533938]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Arun Chopra vs Kaka-Ka Dhaba (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533937]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sandisk LLC vs Raj Enterprises and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trade mark-Whether, permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off, rendition of account of profits, damages and delivery up [LexDoc Id : 533936]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Luxembourg Brands S.A.R.L. and Ors. vs G.M. Pens International (P) Ltd.
Rendition of accounts-Passing off/Infringement-Whether, plaintiffs are entitled to decree of rendition of accounts against defendants, as prayed for. Held, plaintiffs are not entitled to profits ma [LexDoc Id : 533667]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Living Media India Ltd. and Ors. vs Mandeep Kaur and Ors.
Grant of permanent injunction-Infringement of trademark-Whether, defendants can be restrained from infringement and passing off trademark "AAJ TAK" or any other trademark deceptively similar to Plaintiffs' [LexDoc Id : 533422]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sanofi and Ors. vs Faisal Mushtaq and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533420]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Haldiram Bhujiawala Ltd. vs Haldiram India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Disobedience of injunction order-Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.-ADJ is required to dispose of application of respondent/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC in accordance with law after hearing permissible [LexDoc Id : 533421]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Greenlight Planet India (P) Ltd. vs Gee Lighting Technology
[LexDoc Id : 533541]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Gurnam Singh vs G.I. Cosmetics
Grant of injunction-Deceptive similarity-Whether, defendant can be restrain from selling, advertising and dealing in cosmetic products like nail polish, lipstick, kajal and other similar prod [LexDoc Id : 533540]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Luxottica Group S.P.A. and Ors. vs Mify Solutions (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Infringement of trademark or copyright-Sections 79, 81 of Information Technology Act, 2000. Exemption from liability-Whether, defendant 1 and 2 are exempt from liability by virtue of provisions of Section 79 read with Section 81 of Act. Held, User Agreement has claus [LexDoc Id : 533539]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Christian Louboutin SAS vs Nakul Bajaj and Ors.
Infringement of trade mark-Sections 2 (w), 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rule, 2011. Sections 101, 102 of the Trade Mark Act. Exemption from liability of intermediary-Whether, Defendants' use of Plaintiff's mark, logos and image is protected under Section 79 of Act. Held, intermediaries in general have been given ex [LexDoc Id : 532784]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Shoppers Stop Ltd. vs Softobell Inc. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 532783]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd. and Ors. vs Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 532781]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Pankaj Sales Corpn. vs Indra Jain Industries
[LexDoc Id : 532885]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sony Corpn. vs Suresh Kaouromal Gambani and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 532884]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sipra Education Society's, Spring Orchid School vs Pradnya Niketan Education Society's, The Orchid School
Grant of interim injunction-Deceptive similarity between marks-Whether, appellant be restrained during pendency of Suit, from using trade name "Spring Orchid", which is similar to name of Respondent-School . Held, [LexDoc Id : 532561]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation vs Ranchhod M. Shah and Ors.
Grant of interim injunction-Section 134 of Trademark Act, 1999. Deceptive similarity-Whether, Defendants can be restrained from using name 'AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL'. Held, Plaintiff has its registered office in Delhi and has no offi [LexDoc Id : 532560]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Rockwool International A/S and Ors. vs Thermocare Rockwool India (P) Ltd.
Infringement of trademark-Order XIII A Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Summary judgment-Whether, interim injunction restraining defendant from using mark ‘Rockwool’ can be granted. Held, pre-conditions for passing of summary judgment unde [LexDoc Id : 532559]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Montblanc-Simplo GMBH vs Bajaj Belts and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533465]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| |
