Register free! 
VAT - Gujarat - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
1
Documents Found: 10   
Title Forum  Year
State of Gujarat vs Deepak Petroleum Ltd. Reduction of amount of pre-deposit: Tribunal's prima facie view in favour of the assessee-Financial hardship not contemplated by section 73(3) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003, Appeal dismissed-Whether the tribunal was justified in reducing the amount of pre-deposit as directed by the first appellate authority as a condition precedent for hea [LexDoc Id : 492736]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
PSL Ltd. vs State of Gujarat [LexDoc Id : 489291]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
State of Gujarat vs Delta Rubber and Plastics Products [LexDoc Id : 488255]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
State of Gujarat vs Kairavi Steel [LexDoc Id : 486607]
HC (Gauhati) 2015
Alliance Fibers Ltd. and 1 vs State of Gujarat and 2 Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003: Seizure of goods under s.68 and s.69-Goods seized before expiry of limitation period prescribed under s.73(4) not justified, Impugned order set aside-Impugned order was passed under s.68 and s.69 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003 by which the goods belonging to the petitioner came to be seized [LexDoc Id : 486397]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
Nestle India Ltd. vs Dty. CCT and 1 [LexDoc Id : 485911]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
Jitendra R. Gandhi vs CST [LexDoc Id : 481311]
HC (Bombay) 2015
State of Gujarat vs Doshi Printing Press [LexDoc Id : 478592]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
State of Gujarat vs Fair Link Corpn. Grant or rejection of requirement of pre-deposit: Duty of tribunal-Tribunal not entitled to ignore legal principles and decide the matter on merit-If either side approached the tribunal, being aggrieved by the order of either grant or rejection of requirement of pre-deposit, it was open for the t [LexDoc Id : 479714]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
C.V.M. Exports vs Dty. CCT Denial of balance refund on ground of limitation-No question of expiry of period when refund to the extent of 90 percent already made, Refund directed by way of adjustment towards future tax liability-Provisional refund to the extent of 90 percent of the amount was made to the petitioner. The petitioner did not apply for the disbursement of balance [LexDoc Id : 479711]
HC (Gujarat) 2015
 
1