Register free! 
VAT - Tamil Nadu - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
1
Documents Found: 23   
Title Forum  Year
Manikandan Tyres vs Asst. Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 491936]
HC (Madras) 2015
First Garment Mfg Co. India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Rejection of claim for refund of input tax credit on ground of limitation-Fact of export of goods not disputed, Respondents directed to consider the claim afresh-Whether rejection of claim for refund of input tax credit on the ground that the claim was not made within the statutory period of 180 days as per sec [LexDoc Id : 492706]
HC (Madras) 2015
Krishna Oil Stores vs CTO [LexDoc Id : 489223]
HC (Madras) 2015
HDFC Bank Ltd. vs State of Tamilnadu [LexDoc Id : 488315]
HC (Madras) 2015
Chennai Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dty. Commissioner, Joint Commissioner and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 488252]
HC (Madras) 2015
Global Calcium (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner Commercial Taxes [LexDoc Id : 489206]
HC (Madras) 2015
Rajkumar Impex (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 488308]
HC (Madras) 2015
Giant Cement Trading (P) Ltd., SLT Cement Marketers (P) Ltd. and STK Cemment (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner (CT) Chrompet Asst. Circle [LexDoc Id : 488316]
HC (Madras) 2015
Nokia India Sales (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner, State of Tamil Nadu and Appellate Dty. Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 486396]
HC (Madras) 2015
Supreme Industries Ltd. vs Dty. Commercial Tax Officer and Ors. Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Detention of goods on ground that goods moved without transit pass-Clear mention of name of petitioner in invoice along with seller's particulars, Direction to release goods along with vehicle-The first respondent had detained the petitioner's goods in the checkpost on the ground that the goods moved from Ahmadabad to Pondicherry without tra [LexDoc Id : 485129]
HC (Madras) 2015
K.W. Engg. and Signs (P) Ltd. vs Dty. CTO, CCT, Govt. of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Detention of goods-Demand of compounding fee by checkpost as pre-condition for release and collection of tax on presumption that goods likely to be sold clandestinely and tax to be evaded improper-If at all the authorities were under the impression that the assessee was evading payment of tax under law, it was always open for them to initiate pr [LexDoc Id : 485001]
HC (Madras) 2015
Greens Agency vs CTO Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Detention of goods and vehicles-No provision entitling interception of vehicles if vehicles taking diversified route from the regular route, Direction to release goods along with vehicles forthwith-Goods transported by the petitioner in the vehicles in question had been accompanied by proper documents like sale bills as prescribed under the Tamil [LexDoc Id : 484666]
HC (Madras) 2015
Total Oil India (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner Levy of higher rate of tax and penal interest: Rejection of objections-Consistent contention of petitioner that commodity code entered inadvertently, Petitioner permitted to file documents afresh by quoting correct code of commodity-A provisional assessment notice was issued to the petitioner proposing to levy higher rate of tax for the sales turnover inasmuch as, the petitioner h [LexDoc Id : 484540]
HC (Madras) 2015
V.K.N. Hardwares vs State of Tamilnadu and Ors. Levy of VAT: Issuance of demand notice during pendency of appeal-Conditional stay order complied with by petitioner, Interim order to enure till disposal of appeal, Notice held unsustainable-The petitioner had claimed that the third respondent had wrongly levied value added tax under s.3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 on the [LexDoc Id : 481934]
HC (Madras) 2015
Vivek Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Disallowance of exemption on ground that details furnished not acceptable-No documentary proof shown either for claim of sales return or unfructified sale, Failure to discharge burden cast under s.17, Petition dismissed-The respondent had issued notices proposing to revise the assessments by disallowing the exemption and called for objections from the petitioner. Afte [LexDoc Id : 484542]
HC (Madras) 2015
V.V.V. and Sons Edible Oils Ltd. vs CTO Tax liability: Liability fastened on selling dealer-Petitioner directed to produce all relevant purchase documents for verification-The petitioner had challenged a notice calling upon it to pay the tax as the selling dealers had not paid the taxes. It was clearly stated in the impu [LexDoc Id : 480263]
HC (Madras) 2015
Luminous Power Technologies (P) Ltd. vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner and Ors. Discretionary powers of appellate authority-Writ court averse to interfere with acts and actions of statutory authorities unless such acts beyond or in excess of jurisdiction-The appellate authority, exercising his power under s.220(6) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 was indeed a discretionary one. However, it wa [LexDoc Id : 480024]
HC (Madras) 2015
Kollamogru Harihara C A Bank Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors. Classification of products for levy of tax: Products not construed according to their popular or common parlance meaning-No detailed examination for classification done, Matter remitted for clarification for proper adjudication-The appellant was engaged in the business of supply of agricultural implements to various agriculturists. Vide the impugned order, it was clarified th [LexDoc Id : 481076]
HC (Karnataka) 2015
New Medical (P) Ltd. vs Superintendent of Taxes and Ors. Return of revision petitions: No reason for return given-Petitions returned to petitioner with a direction to re-file the same before tribunal-The registrar had returned the revision petitions to the petitioner on the ground that they were not maintainable. There was nothing to show why they [LexDoc Id : 480203]
HC (Tripura) 2015
Care Stream Health India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Power to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record-Pendency of appeal not a bar for the petitioner in approaching the authority under s.84-Pendency of an appeal was not a bar for the petitioner in approaching the authority under s.84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006. The revisio [LexDoc Id : 480017]
HC (Madras) 2015
Sunrise Chennai Distributors (P) Ltd. vs CTO Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Remedy against the impugned order passed under s.84-Petitioner's case not falling under s.23, Dispute about applicability of provisions of Act, Petition dismissed-The remedy against the impugned order passed under s.84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 lay under s.54(1) of the Act. If the petitioner had [LexDoc Id : 480258]
HC (Madras) 2015
Salem Tollways Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner and Ors. Maintainability of writ petition: Availability of alternative remedy-Petition filed to avoid condition of pre-deposit, Plea to declare statutory provision ultra vires not taken before, No case of violation of principles of natural justice or arbitrariness in proceedings, Petitions dismissed-The petitioner had sold crusher machinery and paid tax at four percent treating the machinery as capital goods as defined under s.2(11) of the Tamil N [LexDoc Id : 480250]
HC (Madras) 2015
Tulsyan Nec Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006: Exempted sale-Power of government to notify exemption or reduction of tax in specified contingencies-The contention that the phrase 'goods exempted by notification' occurring in s.15 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 would not cover transacti [LexDoc Id : 476610]
HC (Madras) 2015
 
1