Register free! 
VAT - Tamil Nadu - Judgement
[ 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 ]  

 
1
Documents Found: 11   
Title Forum  Year
Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 527606]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Elite Furniture Mart vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) Input tax credit-Denial-Whether, denial of input tax credit is sustainable. Held, reversal of Input Tax Credit on alleged ground of mismatch as found from Department web port [LexDoc Id : 526502]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Sharoff Syndicate vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) Completion of assessment-Direction to higher authorities-Whether, statement recorded by officials of Enforcement Wing can be put against petitioner while AO completing assessment. Held, since, in instant cas [LexDoc Id : 526772]
HC (Chennai) 2018
State of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Union Surgicals [LexDoc Id : 523948]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Reddy's Laboratories vs State of Tamil Nadu [LexDoc Id : 525824]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Amman Auto Wings vs State Tax Officer [LexDoc Id : 521818]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Sanden Vikas India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Rate of tax-Industrial input certificates-Whether, respondent can ignore rule 6 and take a stand that industrial input certificate produced is of no value. Held, considering the scheme of the [LexDoc Id : 525687]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Sanden Vikas India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) Input certificates-Rate of tax-Whether, correct rate of tax to be adopted in respect of the transactions effected by the petitioner is 4%. Held, goods imported by the petitioner are [LexDoc Id : 521819]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Tvl. V.D.R. Impex vs Assistant Commissioner (CT), Vellore (South) [LexDoc Id : 521820]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Pooja Marbles vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) [LexDoc Id : 525825]
HC (Chennai) 2018
Uma Bricks Industries and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. Use of Form C-Section 10A of the Central Sale Tax Act, 1956. Section 33 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Payment of tax-Petitioner challenged the notice seeking explanation from the petitioner as to why a penalty @ 150% on the leviable tax on the value of the JCB machin [LexDoc Id : 520330]
HC (Tripura) 2018
 
1