| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 241 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
RBBRL Contractors and Anr. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 422777]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Bansal Wire Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Expression that is to say-Expression exhaustively enumerating the kinds of goods in a given list-The expression ‘that is to say’ used in s.14 of the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 was employed to make clear and fix the meaning of what was to be explai [LexDoc Id : 408375]
|
SC |
2011 |
Om Metals and Minerals Ltd. vs ACST and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414383]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. vs India Cements Ltd. and Anr.
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959: Sales tax deferral scheme-Circulars issued by revenue binding on departmental authorities-The Supreme Court, on the question whether the first respondent was eligible for sales tax deferral in any financial year for the sales made in that y [LexDoc Id : 408176]
|
SC |
2011 |
Commissioner of Commercial Tax vs Gautam Pandey
[LexDoc Id : 425482]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Commissioner of Service Tax vs SKY Gourmet Catering (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 417678]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Kannaiah Colour Lab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414428]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. vs Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 408308]
|
SC |
2011 |
Hahnemann Publishing Co. (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 413449]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Sky Gourmet Catering (P) Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 422738]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Chirag Agency vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 440921]
|
HC (Patna) |
2011 |
Maple Exports (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs STO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 416460]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
State of Kerala vs Jyothy Laboratories Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 422782]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
M. Suganthi, Thirumurthy Bus Transport and K. Mahalingam vs ACCE
Challenge to order on ground of violation of principles of natural justice: Existence of alternate remedy not an absolute bar for entertaining writ petitions if violation established-Writ petitions pending for nearly 10 years, No counter affidavit filed by respondent despite service of notice, Direction to petitioners to avail alternate remedy harsh-The primary ground on which the order impugned had been questioned was on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and if the same was [LexDoc Id : 408382]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Tvl. Zodiac Traders vs CTO
Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules 2007-Petitioner permitted to re-submit corrected copies of Form-W and file relevant documents of export sales, Respondent directed to consider and pass appropriate orders-The high court set aside the impugned order of the respondent dated 25 February 2011 and permitted the petitioner to re-submit corrected copies of For [LexDoc Id : 414348]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
CTT vs Varun Beverages Ltd.
Fixed capital investment: Bottles and crates-Bottles essential part of components and equipments necessary for running of factory, Bottles entitled to exemption, Crates used only for marketing purposes, Crates not includible in fixed capital investment-The Supreme Court, considering whether bottles and crates used by the respondent could be said to be essential apparatus or equipments or components f [LexDoc Id : 407790]
|
SC |
2011 |
Earbis Engg. Co. Ltd. and Anr. vs Deputy CST and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 438015]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
State of Punjab vs Gopal Krishan Chemicals
[LexDoc Id : 429448]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Shree Balajee Udyod and Ors. vs STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438016]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Tvl. Michelin Apollo Tyres (P) Ltd. @ Michelin India Tyres (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner
Levy of additional tax, surcharge and penalty: Returns already submitted and assessment done after verification of records-Levy order set aside, Respondent directed to consider relevant records and objections and pass appropriate orders-Additional tax on the turnover of the petitioner for the AY 2006-07 had been levied stating that it had not filed the returns for the relevant assessm [LexDoc Id : 414349]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Essar Telecom Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Imposition of penalty and interest: Bona fide payment of service tax-Differential amount payable directed to be adjusted from amount already deposited by petitioner and excess amount remaining to be refunded-No penalty or interest was imposable on the petitioner, which exercised its bona fides and, having registered under the service tax, went on paying th [LexDoc Id : 413368]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Murlidhar Vijay Kumar vs Value Added Tax Officer and Ors.
Waiver of pre-deposit: Entitlement to refund-Directions of Addl. Commissioner not carried out due to which refund not quantified and paid, First respondent directed to examine and comply with the directions-The petitioner had sought waiver of pre-deposit and by the common order he was directed to deposit 10,00,000/- as a condition precedent for hearing th [LexDoc Id : 407387]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CTT vs Kartos International
Biology instruments vs Biological instruments-Biology instrument referring to limited range of instruments confined for their use in study of life science, Biological instruments outside the ambit of exemption notification-The term ‘biology instrument’ referred to a limited range of instruments confined for their use in study of life science only whereas the word ‘biolog [LexDoc Id : 407330]
|
SC |
2011 |
Tropicana Beverages @ Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 436180]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
State of Karnataka vs Sree Sapthagiri Industries
[LexDoc Id : 425481]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
