| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 241 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
S. Subrahmanyan and Co. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 413851]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Instrumenatation Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 409771]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Tuobro Furguson India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 449382]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
State of West Bengal and Ors. vs Indian Jute Mills Association and Ors.
Input tax credit: Stores and spare parts for plant and machinery used for manufacturing taxable goods-Benefit of rebate only to consumable stores, Decayed or used up spare parts within the purview of consumable stores-The high court, considering whether stores and spare parts for plant and machinery used for manufacturing taxable goods would fall within the meaning [LexDoc Id : 407958]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Mohan Bakers (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438562]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Ashok Kumar Ghosh vs STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 413454]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Epitome Petrochemical (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs CST and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 413444]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Sakthi Enterprises vs Deputy Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 419632]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Rajpoot Supply Syndicate vs Joint CST and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437945]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 413485]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Madhu Machine Tools, A. Sathya Narayana vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Kara Samadana Scheme: Modification of government order-Order providing for sanction of relief and concessions for rehabilitation of sick industries, Fourth respondent directed to reconsider petitioner’s case based on government order-The petitioner was a proprietorship concern involved in manufacture of precision tools, room components and automobile products. Its unit was declared [LexDoc Id : 409955]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Mura Gents and Mura Readymades vs CTO and Anr.
Crest Leathers vs Assistant Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 445299]
|
HC (Madras) |
2011 |
Sasikumar vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 425435]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Starline Agency vs Nabajit Das and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 413667]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2011 |
Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs State of Karnataka, UOI and Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Tata Teleservices Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Local Vat Officer and Commissioner of Service Tax
Artificially created light energy: Contract between subscriber and service provider in transmission of data or messages an indivisible contract and contract of service simplicitor-ACLE one form of electromagnetic waves, ACLE not goods, No power to assessing authority to levy tax since no sale of goods-The light energy, which was used as a carrier in telecommunication service for rendering service, was covered by the Finance Act 1994 read with s.65(1 [LexDoc Id : 415359]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Starline Agency vs Nabajit Das
[LexDoc Id : 428413]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2011 |
Krishi Enterprises vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 419838]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2011 |
Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Industries vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 422784]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
Nuclear Fuel Complex vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 415234]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
State of Haryana and Ors. vs Mahabir Vegetable Oils (P) Ltd.
Benefit of exemption-Beneficiaries of concession not required to pay tax or duty otherwise liable to be paid-An exemption was nothing but a freedom from an obligation, which an assessee was otherwise liable to discharge. The beneficiary of a concession had no [LexDoc Id : 403665]
|
SC |
2011 |
Century Pulp and Paper vs Commissioner Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 405299]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
Rohit Ferro Tech Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 449470]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Ad Age Outdoor Advertising (P) Ltd. vs Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Jurisdictional fact: Jurisdiction of court or tribunal-Jurisdictional fact: Jurisdiction of court or tribunal-The fact or facts upon which the jurisdiction of a court, a tribunal or an authority, depended could be said to be a jurisdictional fact. If the juris [LexDoc Id : 409545]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
ACCT and Ors. vs Pink City
[LexDoc Id : 430818]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Enviro Chemicals vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 409823]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
