Register free! 
VAT - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 175   
Title Forum  Year
Global Fuels Lubricants, Inc vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax Rejection of application seeking deferment of assessment: Commissioner vested with discretion under s.32(5) to defer proceedings on account of pendency of appeal before court-Non-exercise of discretion, Impugned order set aside with direction to pass appropriate order-The petitioner’s application under s.32(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005 seeking deferment of the assessment proposed for the relevant ta [LexDoc Id : 451007]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2013
North Eastern Coal Fields Coal India Ltd. vs State of Assam and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 457616]
HC (Gauhati) 2013
State of Kerala vs V.M. Rajalakshmi [LexDoc Id : 469087]
HC (Kerala) 2013
Mahyco Seeds Ltd. @ Narmda Vally Hybrid Seeds Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 455018]
HC (Allahabad) 2013
Sima Metal Syndicate vs State of Gujarat [LexDoc Id : 451096]
HC (Gujarat) 2013
Larsen and Toubro Limited and Anr. vs State of Karnataka and Anr. Non-applicability of dominant nature test-States empowered to levy tax on materials used in contractrendering service or where ultimate transaction was transfer of immovable property-The dominant nature test had no application and the traditional decisions holding that the substance of contract should be seen had lost their signifi [LexDoc Id : 449970]
SC 2013
Ganpati Foods vs State of Punjab and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 457623]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2013
Santosh Steel vs Assistant CTO [LexDoc Id : 455617]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. vs Deputy CST and Anr. Power of judicial review-Availability of alternative remedy-Alternative remedy was not an absolute bar though might be one of the grounds for which the high court could refuse to exercise the discretion. The po [LexDoc Id : 456045]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
Ranjit Impex vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 456112]
SC 2013
Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd. @ Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 455879]
HC (Karnataka) 2013
CCE vs Kay Kay Industries Exercise of reasonable care on part of manufacturer of inputs-Satisfaction of all conditions precedent, Prescribed procedure followed, Appeals dismissed-Central Excise Notification No. 58 dated 30 August 1997 (NT) had been issued in exercise of power under rule 57A(6) of the Central Excise Rules 1944, [LexDoc Id : 448336]
SC 2013
State of Haryana vs Haryana State Warehousing Corpn. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 455629]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2013
Venkataramana Food Specialites Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu [LexDoc Id : 449990]
HC (Madras) 2013
Veerashaiva Sangha vs ACCT [LexDoc Id : 470924]
HC (Karnataka) 2013
Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 455434]
HC (Bombay) 2013
S.B. International Gularbhoj vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax [LexDoc Id : 452494]
HC (Allahabad) 2013
State of Tamil Nadu vs Jawahar Mills Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 461011]
HC (Madras) 2013
Rak Ceramics India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Assistant Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 455624]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2013
M. Adinarayana vs CTO and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 457807]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2013
Shree Jagdish Trading Company and Anr. vs State of Uttar Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 462451]
HC (Allahabad) 2013
Nisha Rani Tripathi vs State of UP. and 3 Ors. [LexDoc Id : 461010]
HC (Allahabad) 2013
Ahmedabad Strips (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 451090]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2013
Indian Farmers Fertilizder Co-op Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 461992]
HC (Allahabad) 2013
N.A. Enterprises vs CCE and Service Tax [LexDoc Id : 454816]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2013
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last