| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Last |
| Documents Found: 175 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Prathista Industries Ltd. vs CTO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 468708]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Madhya Pradesh Rajya Powerloom Bunkar Sahakari Sangh Maryadit vs ACCT
[LexDoc Id : 448162]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
Prathista Industries Ltd. vs CTO and Anr.
Initiation and completion of assessment under CST Act 1956: Pendency of application for advance ruling-Provisions of s.67 of AP VAT Act 2005 not applicable to assessments made under CST Act 1956-The first respondent was held entitled to initiate and complete the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 in respect of the petitioner when [LexDoc Id : 445353]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
State of Haryana and Anr. vs Rubber Reclaim Co. of India
Appeal against direction to refund amount availed of by way of tax exemption: Dispatch of goods on consignment basis during relevant assessment periods in breach of rule 28A-Appeal against direction to refund amount availed of by way of tax exemption: Dispatch of goods on consignment basis during relevant assessment periods in breach of rule 28A-The high court had set aside the assessment order passed by the assessing authority, wherein the assessee was directed to refund the amount, which was [LexDoc Id : 444879]
|
SC |
2013 |
John Deere India (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 440747]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2013 |
M.J. Robymon vs Assistant Commissioner and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 457070]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2013 |
Singhal Enterprises vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 440719]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2013 |
State of Haryana vs Liberty Shoes Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 443612]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2013 |
Allentis Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442822]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
State of Gujarat vs Reliance Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 441323]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
Sahyadri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Limitation: Right accruing to party on expiry of limitation not taken away by subsequent Act-Subsequent Act to govern proceedings if it enlarged time while period of limitation prescribed under old Act had not expired-Limitation was a matter of procedural law yet where a right was accrued to the party because the prescribed period of limitation had expired this accr [LexDoc Id : 440925]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Voith Paper Fabric India Ltd. vs State of Haryana
[LexDoc Id : 453440]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2013 |
Rama Phosphates Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Denial of benefit of Incentive Scheme: Benefit availed during operative period of eligibility certificate-Total misinterpretation and wrong application of clause 4(e)(ii) to initiate recovery proceedings, No breach of condition of Scheme by petitioner found, Assessment orders and demands raised for relevant period quashed-The petitioner had challenged the impugned assessment order, inter alia, denying the benefit of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Incentive Scheme 1987. The hig [LexDoc Id : 440943]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Mohammed Sultan Ahmed and Ors. vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce Co-op. Federation Ltd. and Anr.
Applicability of exemption notifications: Rate of tax renumbered by Amendment Act-No change in rate of tax, Exemption applicable to all forest produce exigible to tax, Petitions involving mixed question of facts and law, Liberty reserved to petitioners to prefer application before VAT Commissioner for exemption-The petitioners had challenged the notifications granting exemption partly so as to reduce the rate of tax on minor forest produce to four percent and [LexDoc Id : 447353]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2013 |
Prem Enterprises vs State of Punjab and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442821]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2013 |
Bishal Trading vs State of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 453442]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2013 |
Sunrise Food Products (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Commercial Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 454492]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2013 |
Sterling and Wilson Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 451023]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
P. Premkumar; Sai Trading Co. vs STO and Anr.
Cancellation of registration on failure to furnish additional security: Statutory provisions not taken into account when additional security was demanded and registration was cancelled-Impugned notice directing furnishing of additional security and order cancelling registration set aside, Direction to initiate fresh proceedings if so advised-The petitioner was a dealer registered under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003. He was issued a notice stating that, having regard to the volume of [LexDoc Id : 443564]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2013 |
Shanti Kiran India (P) Ltd. vs CTT
Input tax credit-Cancellation of dealer's registration-In the absence of any mechanism enabling a purchasing dealer to verify if the selling dealer deposited tax, for the period in question, and in the abs [LexDoc Id : 438204]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Kwality Construction Engineers vs Assistant Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 446464]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
M.K.B. Cold Storage vs CTO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 445296]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
PJSC Stroytransgaz vs Assistant Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 451029]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
Gammon India Ltd. vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 449386]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
Hindustan Coco Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. vs State of Andhra Pradesh
Bottles and crates constituting packing material: Levy of tax at four percent-Terms and conditions between parties ignored by assessing authority, Impugned assessment and notice set aside-In the business of sale of soft drinks, there was a facility and practice of recycling the bottles and crates in which beverages were sold and the cha [LexDoc Id : 446478]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Last |
| |
