Register free! 
VAT - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 141   
Title Forum  Year
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. (Kumbakonam) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 338616]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2006
Shiv Enterprises vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 336371]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
State of Kerala vs Universal Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 333231]
HC (Kerala) 2006
Webel Toolsind Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 336373]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2006
Olympic Zippers (P) Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 381232]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
Urvashi Steel Industries (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs CTO and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 368666]
WBTT 2006
Peerless Shipping and Oil Field Services Ltd. and Anr. vs State Of Assam and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 324042]
HC (Gauhati) 2006
Bhartia Associates (P) Ltd. vs State of Assam and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 332575]
HC (Gauhati) 2006
Raghavendra Exports vs Assistant Commercial Tax Officer and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 326278]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2006
Shriram Properties Ltd. vs CST and Anr. Benefit of exemption notification-Condition precedent-A petition against an option granted to a service provider to either avail of Cenvat credit of tax paid on input services or the benefit of an exempti [LexDoc Id : 308886]
HC (Karnataka) 2006
Subhlaxmi Rice Mills (P) Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 368645]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
State of Gujarat vs Sayaji Mills No. 1 [LexDoc Id : 333253]
HC (Gujarat) 2006
Sumer Chand Sudhir Kumar vs State of Haryana and Anr. Withdrawal from a scheme allowing lumpsum payment of VAT-Revision of tax rate-A dealer could opt out of the scheme that allowed it to pay Value Added Tax (VAT) in lumpsum as per its convenience. The fact that the revision of the [LexDoc Id : 308291]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
New Version vs CTO [LexDoc Id : 368701]
HC (Chennai) 2006
Makin Paper Mills vs State of Punjab and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 315425]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Shital Fibres Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Punjab and Ors. Penalty under Punjab VAT Act-Jurisdiction-A writ petition challenging the power to impose penalty at check post under s. 51 of the Punjab Value Added Tax 2005 was allowed as the power was bein [LexDoc Id : 315424]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. vs CST and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 334282]
WBTT 2006
Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd. vs Commissioner, Commercial Taxes [LexDoc Id : 318107]
HC (Kerala) 2006
CTT vs Kapoor Rice Mill [LexDoc Id : 368800]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
Triveni Structurals Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 368658]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
Tilok Chand Swaroop Chand vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 350157]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2006
CCE and C vs Purity Flexpack Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 337492]
HC (Gujarat) 2006
Darshan Agroils Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 368750]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
Protec Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 315553]
CESTAT 2006
XCELL Automation vs Government of Punjab and Anr. Evasion of sales tax-Maintainability of writ petition-A writ petition against imposition of penalty for evasion of sales tax on cast-iron castings at a check post was allowed even though there existed an [LexDoc Id : 314956]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last