First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 127 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Samir Ghosh vs State of Tripura and Ors.
Bank Guarantee-Balance awarded amount-Arbitrator directed Petitioner to pay to Respondent, claimant in arbitration. Whether, application for setting aside of impugned award has been filed [LexDoc Id : 534682]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2018 |
KUN Motor Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Assistant STO, Squad No. III, Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Department and Ors.
Detention order-Without paying taxes-Petitioner challenged detention order issued by respondent for driving vehicle without paying proper taxes. Whether detaining of vehicle was unlawful. [LexDoc Id : 533866]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Gunno Knits (P) Ltd. vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Levy of tax-Process of job work-Tribunal upholding the levy of tax on chemicals used as consumables in the process of job work of dyeing of fabric by assuming that property in the go [LexDoc Id : 533935]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
TMT Granites (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner, State Goods and Service Tax and Ors.
Tax concession-Legislative nuances-Petitioner-Company, a registered dealer under the KVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, has been engaged in quarrying and crushing of granite [LexDoc Id : 533666]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
C.C. vs Ashirvad Agro Processors
[LexDoc Id : 533498]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2018 |
OTIS Elevator Co. India Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533536]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd. vs C.G.ST C and C.E.
[LexDoc Id : 533448]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2018 |
Tata Teleservices (Maha.) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 533438]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
New Tarai Stone Crusher and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
Classification of commodity-Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005. New commercial commodity-Whether the river sand and river bazri after being crushed in crusher remains same commercial commodity or it emerges into a new commercial commodity, [LexDoc Id : 532780]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2018 |
Finolex Industries Ltd. vs CST and Ors.
Quantum of benefits-Section 93(1) of MVAT Act, 2002. Retrospective effect.-Appellant is Company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act and is having its registered office in Pune. Appellant Company is engaged in t [LexDoc Id : 533090]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Reji Jose vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533089]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Intelligence Officer, Sqad No. II, Department of Commercial Taxes and Ors. vs Cochin Blue Metal Industries (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Imposition of compounding fees-Enhancement-Whether, impugned order passed by Assessing authority and Appellate authority should be set aside. Held, purposive interpretation to the proviso and t [LexDoc Id : 533088]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Prosper Jewel Arcade LLP vs Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes and Ors.
Re-assessment-Section 62 of the KVAT Act, 2003. Endorsement.-Petitioner sought rectification in the said Order also came to be rejected by the Assessing Authority vide endorsement. Whether rectification sought b [LexDoc Id : 533087]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Nalari Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. vs CCE and Service Tax
Transportation and insurance charges-Appearance-Appeal of Appellant has been dismissed on merits by CESTAT but in absence of Appellant. Whether under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and rules framed th [LexDoc Id : 533086]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2018 |
Karamhans Food (P) Ltd. vs State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 532557]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
I.T.I. Ltd. vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 533636]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
TVS Motor Co. Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Entitlement to benefit of Input Tax Credit-Section 19(5)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Rule 10(9)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007. Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 256 and 301 of the Constitution of India. Sale to state government-Whether petitioner entitled to benefit of input tax credit (ITC) in terms of Section 19(5) (c) of Act. Held, ITC is form of concession which is provid [LexDoc Id : 532681]
|
SC |
2018 |
ALD Automotive (P) Ltd. vs CTO and Ors.
Extension of period-Section 19 (11) of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Input tax credit-Whether, Assessing Authorities could have extended period for claiming Input Tax Credit beyond period as provided in Section 19(11) of Act. Held, in s [LexDoc Id : 532680]
|
SC |
2018 |
Hotel Pallavi vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533637]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Arunnachala Impex (P) Ltd. vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 533642]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Manappuram Finance Ltd. vs ACST, State Goods and Services Tax Department and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533829]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
T. Padmavathi vs Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes Department and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533827]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Cauvery Electronics vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533826]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
ECI-Nayak vs State of Tripura and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533830]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2018 |
SPX Thermal Equipment and Services India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 533825]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
|
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
|