1 |
Documents Found: 18 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Lupin Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 520442]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Vitrag Impex vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Attachment-Pendency of appeal-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case impugned notices of attachment during pendency of the appeal was justified. Held, facts established from [LexDoc Id : 519597]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Carrier Aircon Ltd. vs State of Kerala
Maintainability of Petition-Substantial question of law-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case present revision petition was maintainable on basis of substantial question of law. Held, Tribunal also co [LexDoc Id : 519598]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
R.J. Atlas Jewellery vs STO, Commissioner of State Tax
Payment of tax-Compounded rates-Whether, first respondent was justified in allowing application preferred by petitioner under clause (f) of Section 8 of the Act for payment of tax at [LexDoc Id : 520438]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
Vijay Shankar Prasad vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Double jeopardy-Criminal prosecution-Whether, criminal prosecution can be said to be barred or a case of double jeopardy. Held, it is clear that prosecution in criminal law and proceeding [LexDoc Id : 519594]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
Jagteshwar Prasad Bansal and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
Enforceability of award-Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Adjudicatory process.-Whether, arbitral award has not become enforceable because of pendency of the objection petition under section 34 of the Act. Held, as SARFAESI Act an [LexDoc Id : 519599]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2017 |
New Mount Trading and Investment Co. Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner Grade-I Commercial Tax and Ors.
Validity of reassessment proceedings-Section 29 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2007. Jurisdiction to issue reassessment notice-Petitioner has challenge the reassessment proceeding initiated against it under Section 29 of the Act. Whether, the assessing authority has reasons to [LexDoc Id : 519431]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
New Saravana Stores Bramandamai vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 517702]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Dish TV India Ltd. vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 517701]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Arun Agencies vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 517299]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 517302]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Bhagwati Coke Industries (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 517300]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
Eye Foundation Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner (Commercial Taxes) and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 517301]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
State of Gujarat vs Ahmedabad Jilla Sahkari Doodh Utpadak Sangh Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 513085]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Polyhose India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 513088]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Royal Welding Wires (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 513087]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
L.G. Electronics India, (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Department of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513086]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
Kishan Lal and Co. and Ors. vs ACCT and Ors.
Jurisdictional error-Notice-Whether, jurisdictional error in orders of the learned Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax. Held, In present case, it has already been held that d [LexDoc Id : 512122]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2017 |
|
1 |
|