| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1858 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment and Ors. vs T. Surendran and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504831]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Delhi Transport Corpn. vs Rajender Kumar
Penalty of removal set aside by labour court and upheld by single judge: Absence without obtaining leave in advance-Circumstances suggesting respondent was guilty of misconduct, Impugned orders set aside-
Whether the labour court was justified in interfering with and setting aside the penalty of removal imposed on the respondent as upheld by the s [LexDoc Id : 504829]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Anil Kumar and Ors. vs High Court of Delhi
Challenge to certain questions of objective type examination-Answers to questions in issue modified-
Whether the challenge pertaining to certain questions of objective type examination was maintainable. Held, as regards the first question plain [LexDoc Id : 504821]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. and Ors. vs Reliance Communication Ltd.
Sanction to scheme of arrangement-Section 180 of Companies Act, 2013. Transfer of telecom business.-Petitioner sought sanction of scheme of arrangement for transfer of telecom business undertaking of Transferor Company to Transferee company on an ong [LexDoc Id : 504479]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Vitthal Agro Exports and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504343]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Montecarlo Ltd. vs NTPC Ltd.
Rejection of tender-Qualifying requirements for tender-The petitioner challenged the rejection of its tender. Whether, the proposal/bid of the petitioner was responsive to the qualifying requirements set o [LexDoc Id : 504336]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Harmanprit Singh Sidhu vs Arcadia Shares and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd.
Application for condonation of delay-Section 34 and Section 37(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.Re-filling.-Application for delay which was filed under Section 5 of Act had been allowed by single judge by virtue of impugned order. Whether, impugned order by [LexDoc Id : 504292]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Eurocoustic Products Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Non-selection-Adoption of unfair treatment-Petitioner was not selected by respondent in pre-qualification level. Whether, respondents was adopted any irrational approach in not selecting petiti [LexDoc Id : 504288]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Balasaheb and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504284]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Gujarat State Co-op Marketing Federation Ltd. vs National Agriculture Co-op Marketing Federation
Interpretation of contract-Jurisdiction of arbitrator-Arbitrator allowed counterclaim of Respondent directing GSCMF to make payment of certain amount after adjusting claim amount. Whether, Arbitrator just [LexDoc Id : 504188]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Dow Agrosciences India (P) Ltd.
Dow Agrosciences India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Claim of bad debt-Section 36(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Books of accounts.-Whether, CIT(A) was justified in allowed claimed of bad debts which was disallowed by AO. Held, AO disallowed claim on reasoning that assessee has not [LexDoc Id : 506264]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Sri Venkateswara Service Station vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of dealership-Section 201 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Validity of order.-Petitioner challenged order of termination of his temporary dealership.Whether, order of termination was not passed in accordance with law. Held, as p [LexDoc Id : 505064]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Rani Soni and Ors. vs Indian Oil Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505059]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Nine Media and Information Services Ltd. vs Hero Honda Motors Ltd. and Ors.
Non-proved documents-Section 84(4) of the Companies Act, 1956. Duplicate certificate.-Trial Court considered evidence adduced on record by appellant and concluded that appellant has failed to prove documents and also originals of those [LexDoc Id : 505029]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Abhay Gas Agency vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of distributorship agreement-Revoking the termination-The distributorship was terminated by respondent IOC, dispute of which referred to sole Arbitrator. Arbitrator held that that action of termination of [LexDoc Id : 504977]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
UCO Bank and Ors. vs Nityananda Paul and Ors.
Denial of gratuity on ground of misconduct-Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. UCO Bank Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976. Entitlement to gratuity-Whether, the employees of the UCO Bank who were held guilty of misconduct are entitled to payment of gratuity under the Act, 1972 or under the Regulat [LexDoc Id : 504902]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Manish Sharma vs Central University of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504885]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Mahesh Singh Bisht vs Canara Bank
Employment on compassionate ground-Entitlement to employment-The Petitioner challenges the decision of the Respondent - Canara Bank in refusing to the petitioner employment on compassionate ground and/or the ben [LexDoc Id : 504884]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
P. Cherian Urumis vs Labour Court and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504757]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Sri Venkateswara Service Station vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of temporary dealership-Validity of termination order-The petitioner challenged the order of the termination of dealership and prayed for quashing the same and for directing the respondent to resume the s [LexDoc Id : 504342]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Oil India Ltd. vs Essar Oil Ltd.
Termination of contract-Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Setting aside of award-Dispute has arisen over the contract among parties for delay in completing work assigned by the respondent was referred to arbitration. Petitioner cha [LexDoc Id : 504337]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Gopal Das vs India Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504289]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Ashok Kumar Lohia vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505191]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Ireo Waterfront (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Keshav Gupta and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504983]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Ramesh Kumar Pandey vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Cancellation of tender-Validity of commercial decision-The petitioner prayed for issuing direction to respondent to issue letter of acceptance as well as to enter into an agreement with the petitioner for [LexDoc Id : 504340]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
