| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | Last |
| Documents Found: 1858 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. vs Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn. and Ors.
Award of contract: Offer of fifth respondent found to be most competitive-More than one revised offer made by petitioner after the opening of sealed tenders, Petition dismissed-Whether award of contract in favour of fifth respondent was justified. Held, the first to fourth respondents had opened the sealed tenders in the pres [LexDoc Id : 492755]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs National Telecom of India Ltd. and Ors.
Objections to arbitral award: Scope of interference by appellate court-One of plausible and possible conclusions arrived at by arbitrator, Objections dismissed-Whether the arbitrator was justified in allowing the claim petition filed by the first respondent and awarding in its favour a sum of Rs.1.09 crores a [LexDoc Id : 492750]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shyam Vir Singh vs DLF Universal Ltd.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Opposite party not having ability to influence the conditions of competition, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the allegation that the opposite party, being a dominant player in the market, had imposed unfair and arbitrary terms and conditions in the ag [LexDoc Id : 492880]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Association of third Party Administrators Informant vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Anti-competition: Formation of Health Insurance Third Party Administrator India Ltd.-Decision of four public sector general insurance companies mutually beneficial, Case closed-Whether by forming Health Insurance Third Party Administrator India Ltd. (HITPA), the public sector general insurance companies (PSGICs) had adversely [LexDoc Id : 492877]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Management of Narendra and Co. (P) Ltd. vs Workmen of Narendra and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 492711]
|
SC |
2016 |
Shree Balaji Concast (P) Ltd. vs CCT
U.P. VAT Act 2008: Seizure of goods on ground that Form 21 filled up by two pens in different inks-No illegality committed by assessee in transportation of goods, Goods directed to be released forthwith-Whether the seizure order on the ground that Form 21 accompanying the goods was filled up by two pens in different inks and the entries made in one of [LexDoc Id : 492704]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Adani Enterprises Ltd. and Ors. vs Addl. CIT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 494055]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Nirmal Singh Bhangoo vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 492520]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | Last |
| |
