| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1858 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Turbo Aviation (P) Ltd. vs Bangalore International Airport Ltd., GVK Power and Infrastructure Ltd. and Airports Authority of India
Competition Act 2002: Allegations of abuse of dominant position-No cogent material in support of allegations, No case under section 3 and section 4 made out-Whether the allegations of informant pertaining to infraction of provisions of section 3 and section 4 of the Competition Act 2002 by the opposite par [LexDoc Id : 492881]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Raghubir Mertia vs Aura Real Estate (P) Ltd. and Waghere Promoters
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Absence of dominance of opposite parties in relevant market, No case under section 4 arising-Whether the conduct of opposite parties in not delivering the possession of subject flat in a timely manner, imposing unfair terms and conditions thro [LexDoc Id : 492878]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Yusuf Kagzi and Ors. vs Avigo Trustee Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Appeals against order of CLB-Oppression and mismanagement, Reconstitution of board of directors-Whether the order of CLB accepting the case of respondents of oppression and mismanagement and reconstituting the board of directors of second appella [LexDoc Id : 492779]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Shikha Misra and Ors. vs S. Krishnamurthy
Dismissal of suit for specific performance: Suit barred by limitation-Agreement to sell not constituting a binding or enforceable agreement, Appeal dismissed-Whether the order of single judge deciding the preliminary issues framed in the suit in favour of the respondent and dismissing the suit was sustainab [LexDoc Id : 492778]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Prerna Construction (P) Ltd. vs Hakim Singh Yadav and Ors.
Rejection of impleadment application: Necessary party-Revisionist likely to be affected on account of judgment and decree in suit, Impugned order set aside-Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the application for impleadment of revisionist on the ground that the revisionist was not a necessa [LexDoc Id : 492775]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Kailash Varma and Ors. vs Dushyant Varma and Ors.
Non-performance of statutory functions: Subsequent events after filing of instant revision petitions-Pendency of title suits no ground to non-discharging of statutory functions and duties-Whether disputes between parties could be settled in view of comments filed by them to the recommendations made by the mediators and conciliators. Hel [LexDoc Id : 492774]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. and Ors. vs Roadway Solution India (P) Ltd.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996: Place of arbitration agreed as Mumbai-District court at Pune lacking jurisdiction to entertain application under section 9, Appeal allowed-Whether the district court at Pune could have exercised jurisdiction to pass the injunction order in the teeth of jurisdiction clause in the agreement [LexDoc Id : 492758]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Engineers India Ltd. vs Tema India Ltd.
Arbitral award: New issue framed while passing final award-Appellant's failure to prove any loss or damage, Impugned order setting aside the award upheld-Whether the order setting aside the arbitral award was justified. Held, the arbitrator had exceeded his jurisdiction inasmuch as he had framed an issu [LexDoc Id : 492754]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Chuni Lal and Ors. vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 492752]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Super Auto Forge Private Ltd. ACIT
Disallowance of expenses-Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Setting off of loss-The assessee challenged the disallowance made under section 14A of the Act and also disallowance of setting off of loss under section 10AA of the Act. [LexDoc Id : 494096]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Kumaran Systems (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenditure-Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Allowabilty of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income-The assessee challenged the disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Rules on the ground that these incurred in [LexDoc Id : 494085]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Kirloskar Proprietary Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 493487]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
R.R. Kabel Ltd. and Ors. vs Incab Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Sick company: Scheme of rehabilitation-Scheme backed by operating agency and not objected to by secured creditors, Petitions dismissed-Whether the order of BIFR, as upheld by AAIFR, holding that the rehabilitation scheme proposed by Tata Steel Ltd. (TSL) was the best amongst the three [LexDoc Id : 493159]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Yeshwanth Shenoy vs Air India, Alliance Air and Air India Express and Ors.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Exercise of free choice by second opposite party to avail services of first opposite party, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the informant's prayer to, inter alia, impose penalties on first opposite party for engaging in abuse of dominant position, direct second oppo [LexDoc Id : 492884]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Sanyogita Goyal vs Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Major developers competing with opposite party in relevant market, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the allegations relating to a commercial space booked by the informant in the project of the opposite party were tenable. Held, the informant [LexDoc Id : 492879]
|
MISC |
2016 |
CIT vs Dharampal Satyapal
Taxing gains arising on slump sales-Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Computation of net worth-The dispute has been arisen with regard to the computation of the net worth of the business transferred by the Assessee by way of slump sale. The Asse [LexDoc Id : 492781]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
B.I.F.R. and Ors. vs KMA Ltd. and Ors.
Overriding preferential payments: Claims and dues of workmen-Adjudication of dues, Date of payment of wages and gratuity-Whether the dissenting workmen were bound by the consent terms or whether they were entitled to be paid in accordance with section 529 and section 529 [LexDoc Id : 492773]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs OL and Zodana Electronic Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 492757]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Chairman Managing Committee ARTRAC and Ors. vs Devki Nand Kalta
[LexDoc Id : 492753]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
State of Bihar and Ors. vs Sanjay Kumar and Azad Kumar Singh
[LexDoc Id : 492714]
|
SC |
2016 |
Orpak Systems Ltd. vs ADIT
Taxability of income relating to supply of equipment outside India-Nature of Contract-The assessee was Israel Company entered into agreement for supply, install /implement and support retail automation systems with Indian company, Hindu [LexDoc Id : 492572]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Qualcomm India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Selection of Companies as comparables-Determination of Arms Length Price in case Business Support Services-The TPO considering the relevant Business Support Agreements and the functions performed concluded that when considered with the functions performed q [LexDoc Id : 492482]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Damodar Lal vs Sohan Devi and Ors.
Perverse finding-Question of fact-Whether, impugned order passed by High Court sustainable. Held, approach made by the High Court has been wholly wrong, if not, perverse. It should not [LexDoc Id : 530063]
|
SC |
2016 |
Rudhra Dev Aviation (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Globe Detective Agency (P) Ltd.
Winding up: Failure to pay in spite of issuance of statutory notices-No dispute that amounts due to respondent, Appeals dismissed-Whether the order admitting the winding up petitions filed against the appellants and appointing of official liquidator was sustainable. Held, in spit [LexDoc Id : 492777]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Radha Raman Debnath and Ors. vs Uttam Bal
Specific performance of contract: Respondent's decree having priority over the decree of petitioners-Interests of petitioners already protected, Petition dismissed-Whether the order of appellate court holding the respondent to be entitled to specific performance of contract on payment of balance amount was sustai [LexDoc Id : 492776]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | Next | Last |
| |
