Roopa Engg. Corpn. vs Telecom and Ors.
Appointment of arbitrator-Jurisdiction of arbitrator-Once a party had made an appointment of an arbitrator, it was not within the province of proceedings under s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac [LexDoc Id : 301286]
Prathyusha Associates vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd.
Setting aside award-Viable with public policy-Merely because the arbitral award suffered with trivial illegality, it could not be set aside and was not contrary to public policy. The arbitrator ha [LexDoc Id : 294946]
Pursottam Das Chokhani vs Sarita Devi Nathani
Setting aside of award-Grounds to set aside under s.34 of the Arbitration Act-No interference could be made with the ex parte arbitral award made under s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, as the procedure adopted [LexDoc Id : 294947]
K. Narayana Raju, Contractor vs UOI and Ors.
Appointment of substitute arbitrator-Prayer for termination of mandate of the existing arbitrator-The petitioner could not automatically seek appointment of substitute arbitrator on the ground that the constituted tribunal was not proceeding with [LexDoc Id : 295219]
Rajasthan Housing Board vs Narendra Kumar and Anr.
Award made the rule of the court-Winding up proceedings-An arbitration award that had been made the rule of the court against Avas Vikas Sansthan could not be set aside merely because winding up order was p [LexDoc Id : 301294]
C.C. Kondaiah vs State of Karnataka and Anr.
Condonation of delay-Setting aise of arbitral award-The delay in filing an application against the ex parte award was not condoned, as the respondnet remained away from the hearings held by the arbitra [LexDoc Id : 292087]