| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2990 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vidya Shankar Dixit vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 281186]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
WTO vs Chetnaben J. Shah L/ H of Late J.K. Shah
[LexDoc Id : 279353]
|
ITAT Ahmedabad |
2004 |
Baijnath Prasad Goyal vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 263397]
|
ITAT Agra |
2004 |
ITO vs Resma Devi
[LexDoc Id : 261945]
|
ITAT Jodhpur |
2004 |
CIT vs Ramesh Chandra Khandelwal
[LexDoc Id : 238674]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2004 |
National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 238106]
|
AAR |
2004 |
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd., In re
Book profits - Advance Against Depreciation (AAD) - The assessee, a public sector corporation, generated and supplied electric power to various states and state electricity boards at tariff rates notifi... [LexDoc Id : 237849]
|
AAR |
2004 |
Bazaloni Group Ltd. (George Willamson Ltd. and Anr.) vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 233985]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2004 |
Jaswant Kaur Sehgal, Sardar Mahendra Singh Sehgal, Sardar Harvinder Singh Sehgal, Jasmeet Kaur Sehgal vs CIT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 233984]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2004 |
Hari Nagar Sugar Mills Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 233983]
|
Patna HC |
2004 |
CIT vs Punjab Con-cast Steels Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 233982]
|
Punjab and Haryana HC |
2004 |
CIT vs Jhalani and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 233981]
|
Delhi HC |
2004 |
CIT vs Modi Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 233975]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Pushpa Devi vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 233974]
|
Rajasthan HC |
2004 |
Annapoorna Agencies (P) Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 233973]
|
Delhi HC |
2004 |
CIT vs Ratna Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Trading receipt-Difference in price of levy sugar-AY 1982-83. The amount of difference in the price of levy sugar raised by the assessee as per an interim order of the high court was not a part of its [LexDoc Id : 308721]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2004 |
CWT vs Masood Halim
Valuation of residential house-Law applicable-AY 1969-70 – 1974-75. Rule 1BB of the Wealth Tax Rules 1957, applicable from 01 April 1979, being a procedural rule, was applicable to all pending ass [LexDoc Id : 306940]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2004 |
Raasi Cement Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Waiver of interest-Condition precedent-The refusal to waive or reduce the interest payable by the assessee was justified since the conditions prescribed under s.220(2A) of the Income Tax Ac [LexDoc Id : 291989]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2004 |
ITO vs Abbas Ali Shiraz
[LexDoc Id : 287767]
|
ITAT Bangalore |
2004 |
Nitin P. alias Modi vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 279217]
|
Delhi HC |
2004 |
Bank of Baroda vs JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 263583]
|
ITAT Mumbai |
2004 |
Rassi Cement Ltd. vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 263086]
|
Andhra Pradesh HC |
2004 |
Asstt. CIT vs Hotel Navaratna Complex
[LexDoc Id : 237374]
|
ITAT Bangalore |
2004 |
Raasi Cement Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Initial Depreciation-Construction of residential premises for employees-AY 1982-83. The assessee was not entitled to the initial depreciation on the cost of construction of residential premises allotted to its employees, w [LexDoc Id : 291990]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2004 |
CIT vs ARM Engineers
[LexDoc Id : 285082]
|
Bombay HC |
2004 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
