| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 4379 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
RRB Consultants and Engineers (P) Ltd. as DCIT
Validity of: re-asstt-No failure to disclose material facts-A.Y. 2003-04.
In original asstt the benefit u/s 80-IA was allowed after due consideration and examination of claim. In absence of any failure of [LexDoc Id : 426599]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Bajrang Steel and Alloys (P) Ltd. vs Western Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa
[LexDoc Id : 425492]
|
MISC |
2011 |
CIT vs Sundaram Finance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 425399]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
CIT vs Infosys Technologies Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 424637]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Dhanraj Singh Choudhary vs Nathulal Vishwakarma
[LexDoc Id : 423141]
|
SC |
2011 |
Genpact India vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 421825]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CIT vs Siddartha Trade Links (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421479]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CIT vs S and S Power Switchgear Ltd.
Depreciation allowance-False claim-The A.O. and CIT (A) found on facts after investigation that the plant was not purchased. No depreciation could be allowed.
S. 32 of the Income T [LexDoc Id : 421355]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Atsushi Yoshida, Yasunobu Fukuda, Shunzo Nagahama, Mazahiro Ogawa and Toshiyuki Nakal vs ACIT
Assessee’s Income Chargeable to Tax-Section 147, 148 of Income Tax Act - Validity of Proceedings under section 147/148 of Income Tax Act-AO had served notice to Petitioners under Section 148 of Act and held that income of Assessee chargeable to tax as method of grossing up was been chan [LexDoc Id : 421051]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CIT vs Expeditors International India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421028]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Shankar Manikrao Waghmare and Bhimrao Manikrao Waghmare vs Bhaurao Bapurao Waghmare
[LexDoc Id : 420694]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
M.XIN XIANG AN and Ors. vs Sinoriches Enterprises Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420364]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CIT vs Sanu Family Trust
[LexDoc Id : 433349]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
CIT vs Arts and Crafts Exports
Profits derived from- exports-DEPB-The DEPB was profit derived from export business for purpose of computing deduction u/s 10BA
The ratio of-
Liberty India v. CIT 225 CTR [LexDoc Id : 423926]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Bypass Properties (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 422380]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2011 |
HCL Corpn. Ltd. vs ACIT and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 421095]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Kishan Chand and Co. Oil Ind Ltd. vs CIT
CIT vs Kishan Chand and Co. Oil Ind Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 420925]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Sambhugir Sansthan Trust, Ramdas Namdeo patil, Milind Pundlikrao Patil, Prakash Shriram Warankar, Lalitkumar Shriram Mahalle and Tulshiram Pandhari Ranpise vs Gopal Tulshiram Vidhate, Yogesh Gopal Vidhate, Ganesh Gopal Vidhate and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420703]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Sudha Madhusudan Lanjekar (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. vs Shashikant Gajanan Pathare (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420266]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CIT vs Raghuvir Synthetics Ltd.
Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free loan to sister concern-A.Y. 2001-02.
The assessee had given interest free loan to its sister concern from its own funds. The borrowed funds were not used for the said l [LexDoc Id : 445348]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corpn. vs Gaffer Khan
[LexDoc Id : 445229]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
R. Ramanujam vs By Design (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 445092]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Jai Krishna Prasad vs Bihar State Road Transport Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442287]
|
HC (Patna) |
2011 |
ITO vs Nandlal and Co. and Ors., Vishram, Ajayprakash, Veer Radios and Ors.
Prosecution: Concealment of income-Penalty set aside-The penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) was quashed by Tribunal. No prosecution u/s 276C, or 277 would survive.
Ss. 276C, 277 of the Income Tax Act, 196 [LexDoc Id : 425612]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Pushtikar Laghu Vyaparik Pratishthan Bachat Evam Sakh Sahkari Samiti Ltd. vs UOI
Validity of: re-asstt-Wrong deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i)-A.Y.2004-05
The assessee was a co. op. banking society. The notice u/s 148 was issued on the ground that wrong deduction was given u/s 80P to int [LexDoc Id : 424037]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
