Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 4379   
Title Forum  Year
Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs Petroleum Coal Labour Union and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 444247]
HC (Madras) 2011
CIT and Anr. vs H. Anil Kumar and Hasanand Shobharaj Capital gains-Transfer of : Right to specific performance-A.Y.1998-1999. The assessee had paid Rs.1 Lakh as advance for purchase of property. He withdraw his suit against seller for specific performances for [LexDoc Id : 416765]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
Nanda Ram vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 413998]
HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2011
Himala Hosiery Mfg. Dyeing and Printing Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 412829]
DRAT (Delhi) 2011
CIT and Anr. vs Islamic Academy Education Interest on refund of tax-Refund of tax adjusted out of seized amount-A.Y.2004-2005. The return was filed after search, admitting huge tax liability. the tax payable was adjusted against cash seized. On asstt. there was [LexDoc Id : 408801]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
CIT vs K. Moideen Kutty Haji [LexDoc Id : 408102]
HC (Kerala) 2011
DCIT vs Reclamation Realty India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 407110]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2011
Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board vs UOI Condonation of delay for filing returns-Genuine hardship-A.Y.2000-2001, 2002-2003. The assessee had shown a loss of Rs.1500 crores. It delay was not condoned there would be hardship since loss would not be c [LexDoc Id : 406330]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2011
CIT vs Geetha Krishna Spinning Mills Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 406166]
SC 2011
State of Kerala vs P.D. Shaju [LexDoc Id : 402708]
HC (Kerala) 2011
CIT vs I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 402578]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
CIT vs Aravind Prakash Malpani [LexDoc Id : 402577]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
M.P. State Electricity Board vs UOI Powers of: CBDT-Condo nation of delay- Genuine hardship-AY 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. The assessee was a State Electricity Board. There was a delay in filing loss return due to bifurcation of State. There wou [LexDoc Id : 402461]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2011
DLF Ltd. vs Addl. DG, CCI Writ petition-Challenge to order of Competition Commission of India-The petitioner had challenged the order passed by the Competition Commission of India under s.26(1) of the Competition Act 2002 principally on the gro [LexDoc Id : 401389]
HC (Delhi) 2011
Friends Clearing Agency (P) Ltd. vs CIT Business expenditure- Rule of consistency-No ad hoc disallowance-AY 1992-1993. There could be no ad hoc disallowance of business expenditure. Further such disallowance was deleted by Tribunal in earlier year. Rule o [LexDoc Id : 401350]
HC (Delhi) 2011
Surinder Singh vs State of Punjab [LexDoc Id : 401039]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2011
Shanker Raju vs UOI Interpretation of words-Term and tenure-The expression ‘term’ signified a fixed period or a determined or prescribed duration. The word ‘term’, when used in reference to the tenure of office [LexDoc Id : 400951]
SC 2011
Varun Kumar vs State of Haryana and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 400911]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2011
Sham B. Bhatia vs ED [LexDoc Id : 451138]
ATFE (Delhi) 2011
R. Devanesan and R. Vasanthan vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employee's Provident Fund Organization Sub-Regional Office and Sri Ganapathy Mills Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 440774]
HC (Madras) 2011
Workmen of PMP Textiles vs Management of PMP Textiles and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 414293]
HC (Madras) 2011
UCO Bank and Anr. vs District Magistrate and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 412816]
HC (Allahabad) 2011
Ranbir Singh vs Executive Engineer [LexDoc Id : 412044]
SC 2011
CIT vs State Farming Corpn. of Kerala Ltd. Sale of rubber v. Agricultural income-Sale of: Scrap rubber-Taking yield of rubber was an agricultural operation. The income from sale of scrap-rubber viz- tree scrap,shell scrap and earth scrap was agricultura [LexDoc Id : 410932]
HC (Kerala) 2011
CIT vs M.E. Meeran Right of appeal vis-à-vis Agreed asstt. - Powers of Tribunal-Appeal against agreed asstt.-The assessee had two units at 'T' and 'K'. The unit at 'K' was eligible for deduction u/s 80-IB. Goods from unit 'T' were transferred to unit 'K' at c [LexDoc Id : 410045]
HC (Kerala) 2011
 
First | Prev | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | Next | Last